Back to @George_Kurtz's profile

George Kurtz engagement report

@George_Kurtz - 240K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.04%
of 240K followers
Per impression
0.778%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
5.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
95
interactions (median)
Saved
0.176%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.23/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.778% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 348x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, George Kurtz sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 402 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 19, 2024348x their median

    CrowdStrike is actively working with customers impacted by a defect found in a single content update for Windows hosts. Mac and Linux hosts are not impacted. This is not a security incident or cyberattack. The issue has been identified, isolated and a fix has been deployed. We refer customers to the support portal for the latest updates and will continue to provide complete and continuous updates on our website. We further recommend organizations ensure they’re communicating with CrowdStrike representatives through official channels. Our team is fully mobilized to ensure the security and stability of CrowdStrike customers.

    20K5.7K4.0K3.1K10M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2024147x their median

    Today was not a security or cyber incident. Our customers remain fully protected. We understand the gravity of the situation and are deeply sorry for the inconvenience and disruption. We are working with all impacted customers to ensure that systems are back up and they can deliver the services their customers are counting on. As noted earlier, the issue has been identified and a fix has been deployed. There was an issue with a Falcon content update for Windows Hosts. For the latest information that we will continuously update, please refer to the CrowdStrike website (https://t.co/oTrsi3fNPb), my posts on LinkedIn, and my posts on X.  I will continue to provide updates to our community and the industry as they become available.

    9.1K1.7K2.2K1.0K3.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202456x their median

    As CrowdStrike continues to work with customers and partners to resolve this incident, our team has written a technical overview of today’s events. We will continue to update our findings as the investigation progresses. https://t.co/xIDlV7yKVh

    3.1K8371.1K250985K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202446x their median

    All of CrowdStrike continues to work closely with impacted customers and partners to ensure that all systems are restored. I’m sharing the letter I sent to CrowdStrike’s customers and partners. As this incident is resolved, you have my commitment to provide full transparency on how this occurred and the steps we’re taking to prevent anything like this from happening again. We are working on a technical update and root cause analysis that we will share with everyone as well. https://t.co/s7pDqPCkjS

    2.8K5568132161.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 22, 202620x their median

    Can AI replace security platforms? I asked Claude to build a CrowdStrike replacement. Claude: "I have to be straightforward: building a replacement for CrowdStrike isn't something I can do here. CrowdStrike is a massive platform built by thousands of engineers over a decade-plus. Its core capabilities include real-time kernel-level endpoint monitoring across millions of devices, a proprietary threat intelligence graph built from trillions of security events...That's not something you can replicate with a script — it's an infrastructure product." If you want to create AI, you need GPUs. If you want to deploy AI, you need security. That's not a hallucination – it's a fact. Watch the demo → https://t.co/77OnRmpjUx

    1.4K21813986489K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202212x their median

    Episode 2 of “Driving Ambition” is out and we hit @COTA for some test runs. This one really shows why @LewisHamilton and @MercedesAMGF1 make such great partners for CrowdStrike on both the technology and sports side - it’s all about trust. https://t.co/SEr2OW1gcr https://t.co/9meFBQzLU2

    1.0K7690View on X
  • Oct 14, 20227.3x their median

    A Driving Ambition. 👊 In this new three-part series we'll find out if @CrowdStrike CEO @George_Kurtz can achieve his dream to drive a championship winning F1 car! Watch the first episode of Driving Ambition right here, as George's journey starts at our home in Brackley. 👇

    6364374View on X
  • Jun 4, 20245.3x their median

    Wow… another great quarter in the books for $CRWD. Thank you to our customers, CrowdStrikers, and partners for their dedication to our mission! We delivered record Q1 FY25 results exceed expectations: - Record Q1 net new ARR of $212 million +22% YoY - Q1 ending ARR of $3.65 billion +33% YoY - Record $322 million of free cash flow with a FCF rule of 68 Full results: https://t.co/HYmejDTe5C

    41740291684K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20224.9x their median

    $CRWD delivered a strong 2Q23 with record $218M net new ARR, $2.14B ending ARR, record net new customers & $136M free cash flow. We are the second fastest company to reach $2B in ARR only behind $ZM. See release for details: https://t.co/fkDnWXLQpv https://t.co/kwe0BuFBA2

    40043145View on X
  • Mar 5, 20243.6x their median

    $CRWD delivered record Q4 results. Ending ARR of $3.44B grew 34%. Net new ARR growth accelerated, reaching a record $282M. Our AI-native single platform, single console, single agent approach drives frictionless adoption and consolidation. More info: https://t.co/2XqdGRjhZS https://t.co/oNKEM58jzh

    284251914128K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.778% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 348x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is George Kurtz's engagement rate on X?
George Kurtz (@George_Kurtz) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 239,933 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, George Kurtz sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @George_Kurtz have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @George_Kurtz post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going