Back to @GeorgeDunham's profile

George Dunham engagement report

@GeorgeDunham - 103K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 103K followers
Per impression
0.406%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
7.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 493 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

George Dunham's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, George Dunham sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,319 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.675%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,319 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.675%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 183 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202615x their median

    New album Songbook out January 22nd! To celebrate 25+ years of Randy Rogers Band, we’re revisiting 15 songs from our catalog, each song featuring some of our closest friends. “Tommy Jackson” featuring @ParkerMcCollum, out this Friday! Pre-Save: https://t.co/ZQe9gKbqNf https://t.co/eQU3QAPU4d

    4164792126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20268.1x their median

    Little things matter. The little things that cost the Cowboys in the blocked FG attempt. Upon Further Review at 6:55am on @dfwticket https://t.co/evjxf3mw7g

    19294611369K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.3x their median

    1st Thursday Happy Hour at the Bartonville Store today at 5pm. Recent Ole Miss grad Joaquin Van Trese joins me for some songs and stories. Come hang in downtown Bartonville https://t.co/BBvdTfBfdR

    934706.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.8x their median

    A tribute to coaching legend Kevin Atkinson- one of the hardest goodbyes in Texas high school football. Full story: 👇 ✍️ @Carter_Yates16 https://t.co/2WKtVb3w7z

    66173321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20262.2x their median

    Talking about rookie defenders including Barham in Upon Further Review 6:55 @dfwticket https://t.co/rORpvwQ7RL

    656008.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.7x their median

    Thirty years of Rowdy. 30 years without a Super Bowl. Coincidence? The evidence is troubling. Our Football Friends propose Cowboy Cookie Monster, then get into Von Miller, the preseason opener and the infamous Clint Longley-Roger Staubach fight. Out now wherever you get podcasts!

    4353224K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.6x their median

    3rd QTR drive that ended in a fumble, the Dak just missed a deep throw to Flournoy that would’ve been 6 https://t.co/kWZZZZJw2k

    35412020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.5x their median

    This is a critical 3rd-9 late 2nd in a tie game and the Cowboys played it like they were up by 50 https://t.co/rnxboZVbcg

    4126011K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026

    Come see The Bird Dogs this evening on the Bud Light stage at the @StateFairOfTX at 7:30p! https://t.co/HM4dTL5RMR

    381203.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Nat’l Radio Day! Here’s to the two partners I have been blessed to work with: @GeorgeDunham @Dave_L_Barnett https://t.co/6hZQGJP7dU

    3521113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 493 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is George Dunham's engagement rate on X?
George Dunham (@GeorgeDunham) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 102,543 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, George Dunham sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,319 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GeorgeDunham have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GeorgeDunham post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going