Back to @Georg_Pazderski's profile

Georg Pazderski engagement report

@Georg_Pazderski - 142K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.27%
of 142K followers
Per impression
10.6%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
12.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.189%
32 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 10.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #payforslay.

Compared with accounts its own size

Georg Pazderski's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.27%, Georg Pazderski sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 377 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 20268.0x their median

    L’aide humanitaire à destination de l’Afrique 🌍 est une arnaque géante : https://t.co/W4cZIQD3v2

    11K2.7K241116190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.6x their median

    A proud European meets a proud New Yorker. 🤝 @NYCMayor https://t.co/xLoajIBaGN

    12K6587622161.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.1x their median

    Was für ein Heuchler! 2025 beschwert sich Koczak im Innenausschuss, die PKS würde zur rassistischen Hetze gegen Migranten genutzt und lehnt Polizeimaßnahmrn gegen Clankriminalität ab. Seit gestern wissen wir, er sitzt tief in der Tasche des Remmo-Clans. https://t.co/WImDpat5Fo

    7.6K1.5K1402352K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.9x their median

    Schlechte Nachrichten für Möchtegern-Kanzler Wüst und die UNION! Laut FORSA ist die AfD jetzt auch in NRW stärkste Kraft: 2% vor der CDU, 10% vor der SPD. Die Union stirbt langsam - jetzt auch in ihren Noch-Hochburgen. Und die SPD verliert den Rückhalt bei den Wählern und liegt jetzt deutlich hinter den GRÜNEN und nur noch knapp vor den LINKEN Antisemiten.

    6.2K612731981K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.7x their median

    „Eine einzige wissenschaftliche Katastrophe!“ In der Doktorarbeit der Berliner Innensenatorin und ehemaligen stv. VS-Präsidentin Felor Badenberg (CDU) wurden weitere 134 Plagiate gefunden. Das sind 217 Plagiate auf knapp 200 Seiten. Innensenatorin ist sie immer noch und kassiert monatlich ca. 17.000 Euro.

    5.4K1.2K781324K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.5x their median

    Meine Erfahrungen in der Politik bestätigen die Aussagen von @Markus_Krall. Circa 20% der Abgeordneten sind fleißig, engagiert und tragen eine Fraktion. Der Rest macht sich auf Steuerzahlers Kosten ein schönes Leben. ES IST KEINE BESTENAUSLESE. https://t.co/YC4ifwl5JQ

    5.4K831281870K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.1x their median

    Diese 150 Sekunden zeigen die ganze Wahrheit über die „Free Palestine“ Bewegung in westlichen Ländern. Sie ist zutiefst antisemitisch, geprägt von abgrundtiefem Hass gegen Israel und alles Jüdische. WIDERLICH! https://t.co/zPWcFOuUKH

    4.8K6471196458K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.7x their median

    Gezielte Unterwanderung des Rechtsstaates❓ Wie Recherchen von @niusde_ zeigen, sind Behördenmitarbeiter, die in Niedersachsen Abschiebungen planen und durchführen sollen, bei Anti-Abschiebe-Organisationen tätig, u.a. als politische Aktivisten für mehr Migration. Wie schon der Sechsfachmord von Stade und die Nichtzulassung von AfD-Politikern zu den Kommunalwahlen gezeigt hat - Niedersachsen ist ein tiefroter korrupter Sumpf. Aus diesem tiefroten niedersächsischen Sumpf kommen u.a. die SPD-Politiker Boris Pistorius (10 Jahre Innenminister NDS), Lars Klingbeil, Hubertus Heil und Matthias Miersch. NOCH FRAGEN❓

    3.9K873442628K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.5x their median

    Even in his final address as Secretary-General during the UN General Assembly’s high-level week, Guterres chose to use the podium to deliver a political indictment of Israel, with outrageous insinuations of “ethnic cleansing.” @antonioguterres, this is not diplomacy. This is anti-Israel propaganda under the UN banner. You have turned your office into a tool for attacking Israel and shattered the organization’s credibility. It is time for new leadership.

    3.0K58087479164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.4x their median

    NUN AUCH DIE SPD! Jetzt will die SPD auch mit der ehemaligen SED, die sich heute die LINKE nennt, regieren.  • Antisemitismus: scheißegal • Linksextremismus: scheißegal • Islamismus: scheißegal • Kriminelle Araber-Clans: scheißegal Hauptsache Ämter und Kohle stimmen. Die SPD tritt das Erbe der SPD und eines Otto Wels mit Füßen.

    3.4K7131962628K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#payforslay

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 1.27%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 10.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

What is Georg Pazderski's engagement rate on X?
Georg Pazderski (@Georg_Pazderski) has an engagement rate of 1.27%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 142,277 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.27%, Georg Pazderski sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Georg_Pazderski have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Georg_Pazderski post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going