Geo engagement report
@Geo_AW - 195K followers on X
Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.7K interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 2.93%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 188K times each, and 3.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 96.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #onepiece, #kirkiversary, #onepiece1195.
Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #onepiece, #kirkiversary, #onepiece1195.
Compared with accounts its own size
Geo's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.93%, Geo sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.56% to 82.4%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 91% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 9, 202614x their median
Ben Affleck says that he gets in a lot of arguments with kids on voice chat when playing shooter games. “They taunt you, like, ‘You suck. Fuck you!’ I end up getting in arguments. ‘Fuck you! I don't suck! I'm a grown man!’” (via: https://t.co/1P6guU4wRC) https://t.co/dTb1Aby5hO
- Oct 6, 202612x their median
This random dude got so much screen time in the movie https://t.co/a9OjzjQqvh
- Oct 9, 202611x their median
https://t.co/j6uGgtJpfA
- Oct 9, 202611x their median
One piece full summary.. https://t.co/YERme80yAs
- Mar 28, 202426x their median
watch one piece https://t.co/HsNi3c25sQ
- Oct 9, 20265.2x their median
これが何を表しているかわかった人は天才 https://t.co/k2DwG1HRNN
- Oct 8, 20265.0x their median
ALIENS IN ALIENS IN PEACEMAKER. LANTERNS https://t.co/yFxntAV5EK
- Oct 4, 20264.5x their median
The response Lanterns is getting is actually insane https://t.co/ypawjGjhIY
- Sep 10, 20264.3x their median
Wolverine: - QTEs that complete themselves - a gameplay loop that plays itself at times & is scared you’ll have a moments of uncertainty so has systems made to keep you wrapped in cotton wool - will serve as lesson to game devs on how this style of AAA game design has expired https://t.co/n7Uv9GlBye
- Oct 7, 20263.9x their median
No idea what I’m watching but he really looks like an alternate universe Luffy https://t.co/PVRTFgL16s
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.7K interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 2.93%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 188K times each, and 3.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 96.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #onepiece, #kirkiversary, #onepiece1195.
- What is Geo's engagement rate on X?
- Geo (@Geo_AW) has an engagement rate of 2.93%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,341 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.93%, Geo sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Geo_AW have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Geo_AW post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.