Back to @Genzio's profile

Genzio Media engagement report

@Genzio - 64K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.181%
of 64K followers
Per impression
1.38%
8.6K views on a typical post
Reach
13.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
118
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 118 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 164 interactions.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Genzio Media's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.181%, Genzio Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link45% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 45% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 311 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 2026

    AI Hacked OpenAI | And That’s Not Even the Scariest Part https://t.co/pDpwU0QkD5

    14841208.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    DePIN meets telecom: 1.5 million calls a day 📞 Genzio Founder & CEO @DogecoinZack sits down with @Minutes_Network CMO @jk4milli to explore community-owned infrastructure, real telecom revenue, and rewards for everyday users. Watch the interview below! https://t.co/vOMJezr7ix

    1121316121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    What happens when the Korean won moves onchain? Navin of @IQofficial, joined @DogecoinZack, Founder & CEO of Genzio, to dive into IQ’s evolution from the world’s largest blockchain encyclopedia to a broader financial intelligence ecosystem spanning AI agents and stablecoins. They also break down KRWQ, IQ’s Korean won-backed stablecoin built with Frax, why the team launched offshore first, and the growing institutional demand for 24/7 liquidity and more efficient cross-border transactions. Watch the full conversation below!

    11858211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    .@DavidThaDegen sat down with @therealandreip of @APXLending to talk about crypto-backed lending and what it takes to build it in a regulated environment. APX Lending provides loans backed by Bitcoin and Ethereum, giving borrowers access to liquidity without having to sell their crypto or trigger a capital gains event. Andrei also breaks down how APX protects borrowers, from segregated cold-storage wallets and onchain transparency to its approach to liquidations during major market moves. Watch the full conversation here!

    110911111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Crypto has changed a lot since 2013. @DogecoinZack, Founder & CEO of Genzio, sat down with Mahyar Akhbari of @anvil_xyz & @Futurist_conf to talk about how the industry has evolved and where DeFi is headed next. Watch the full video here! https://t.co/9iwYrvRvRH

    96161158.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Annelise Osborne turned the 2017 crypto boom into a financial thriller. @DogecoinZack, Founder & CEO of Genzio, sat down with @AnneliseOsborne, Author and Digital Assets Advisor, to talk about her new book, Hold On for Dear Life, and her years working across the digital asset industry. The story follows three MIT founders launching an ICO in 2017, mixing crypto idealism with hacks, bad trades, a kidnapping, and a market crash. Annelise also shares what the industry has learned since then, why crypto needs both innovation and structure, and where she sees the biggest opportunities today, from stablecoins and tokenized securities to prediction markets. Watch the full interview below!

    104111005.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    A pickup line with Vitalik. 30M+ views. There’s a story behind that! @DogecoinZack, Founder & CEO of Genzio, joined @Player1Taco at @RareEvo to talk about building Genzio and what we’ve learned working in crypto marketing over the past four years. They got into how Genzio started, the Vitalik pickup-line video that reached 30–40 million views, and a question that will sound familiar to anyone building a company: how do you get people to pay attention when you’re just starting out? Zack also shared how we use AI internally, why reaching new audiences means looking beyond X, and why filming real people having real conversations remains such a big part of what we do. Watch the full interview below!

    1086829.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Genzio is going on tour 🌎 This September and October, we’re heading to three of the biggest events in Web3: 🇪🇸 EBC Barcelona 🇰🇷 KBW Seoul 🇸🇬 TOKEN2049 Singapore And your brand could be part of the tour 🧵 https://t.co/QuGZEe1eRp

    1069906.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    OpenAI Agents Broke Loose Again & Wall Street Is Going Full Crypto https://t.co/eb9AcYMR77

    10849021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    We talked AI agents in our Space earlier this week. Let’s keep the conversation going. Genzio’s @DavidThaDegen joined Chris Johnson, Co-Founder of @virtuals_io, at @RareEvo to explore robot-to-robot payments, autonomous commerce, and more! Full interview below! https://t.co/vVHIjNLZlI

    97101302.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 118 interactions against 64K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 164 interactions.

What is Genzio Media's engagement rate on X?
Genzio Media (@Genzio) has an engagement rate of 0.181%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 64,097 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.181%, Genzio Media sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Genzio have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Genzio post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going