Back to @GenPadalecki's profile

Genevieve Padalecki engagement report

@GenPadalecki - 657K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.023%
of 657K followers
Per impression
1.56%
9.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
150
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 657K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112K interactions, about 748x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Genevieve Padalecki sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 5, 2026748x their median

    The final trailer for the final season. Have a watch. Have a weep. Then strap the fuck in, because we're only a month away. https://t.co/w97YdXGeoc

    87K18K1.6K5.5K5.6M viewsView on X
  • Dec 7, 2025582x their median

    We’ve been informed these two may know each other https://t.co/TgJqcncpLI

    78K7.2K5431.6K3.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202436x their median

    I’m on a plane headed to NC where the horrific devastation of #HurricaneHelene has derailed so many lives. The cast of #Supernatural and @CreationEnt are working with @RandomActsOrg to do what we can to help survivors. With #HurricaneMilton bearing down on FL, we’re raising funds to help rebuild from both disasters. We have put up a $35,000 match, so every dollar you donate now will be doubled. Please join in this effort. 100% of donations will go directly to supporting those most in need. Thank you. https://t.co/ed8yXFDmqi

    4.4K841138821.4M viewsView on X
  • Nov 5, 202418x their median

    Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, my state of Texas and 20 other states have implemented extreme bans on women's rights, some starting as early as 5 or 6 weeks-before most women even know they are pregnant. 1/3 #GoVote https://t.co/yoKIiRJvCv

    2.4K30412557K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 202616x their median

    Dumping Florence on y’all. Even though I’m already home. #italianwithdrawls https://t.co/6mSPDbQ7W4

    2.3K14312164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202412x their median

    EXCLUSIVE: Jared Padalecki is returning to series television. The former Supernatural star, coming off a four-season run as the lead of Walker, has been tapped for a three-episode arc on the upcoming third season of CBS’ hit drama series ‘Fire Country,’ headlined and executive produced by Max Thieriot. All the details we know here: https://t.co/5lAquCqeL6

    1.2K30544212197K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 202411x their median

    ❤️

    1.3K831481240K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 202411x their median

    Tonight’s episode was a pinch-me moment! ✨ I got to revel in a dreamy episode that I’ll cherish forever. I can’t thank you all enough for watching and supporting the show. As an actor, this has been such a gift. #Walker #WalkerFamily 3/3 https://t.co/fg8XRE4F1R

    1.4K155621129K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20248.0x their median

    Thinking about our little #Walker family on Wednesdays still. 🥹

    989871072436K viewsView on X
  • May 23, 20247.9x their median

    If I told you Emily may make an appearance in a future episode 🤔… #Walker

    1.0K80761785K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 150 interactions against 657K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112K interactions, about 748x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Genevieve Padalecki's engagement rate on X?
Genevieve Padalecki (@GenPadalecki) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 657,083 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Genevieve Padalecki sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GenPadalecki have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @GenPadalecki post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going