Back to @Gemini's profile

Gemini engagement report

@Gemini - 635K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 635K followers
Per impression
0.984%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
3.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
239
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 239 interactions against 635K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.984% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gemini's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Gemini sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 202644x their median

    UPtober is here so we're giving away $100 to one person that likes this post and follows @Gemini winner selected October 2nd ✅ https://t.co/ymX8L2vuVY

    6.8K1.8K1.8K26180K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202618x their median

    GEMINI × KASPA SILVER Join us live with @KaspaSilver for a conversation about Kaspa, the technology behind the project, and the community around it. Tomorrow @ 9am ET Be there or be square🟧 https://t.co/DYuISvFTPY

    2.5K1.1K505159262K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202614x their median

    what's your ripple:native address? drop it below & repost this got a surprise for one of you👀

    1.6K7169892079K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202612x their median

    soon https://t.co/wQex15JS9j

    2.5K2101232984K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202610x their median

    acKnowledge everything At leaSt once

    1.4K429506146268K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.6x their median

    i'm the boss now https://t.co/laYuhPj1v9

    1.6K13057758K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.4x their median

    next week, everyone will be talking about _____.

    9828664247104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.1x their median

    gm.........today is a fun day ;)

    1.3K992701672K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.3x their median

    MORNING MOTION: GoPro is RUNNING, everything is going onchain, chatting KAS & ZEC https://t.co/t2n8zGFDrY

    9773761213369K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.3x their median

    me entering the trenches with $47 and a dream https://t.co/NDR2kUxjYQ

    1.2K1251543378K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 239 interactions against 635K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.984% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is Gemini's engagement rate on X?
Gemini (@Gemini) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 635,092 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Gemini sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Gemini have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Gemini post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going