Gavin Newsom engagement report
@GavinNewsom - 3.2M followers on X
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.233%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 5.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 102K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Gavin Newsom's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.233%, Gavin Newsom sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 69% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 212 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 202614x their median
BREAKING: Jimmy Kimmel announces his interview with Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico will NOT air on ABC tomorrow, saying Trump’s FCC has threatened him, his show, ABC, its affiliates, and local stations over “simple traditional editorial decisions” and guest bookings. Kimmel says the full interview will instead be posted to YouTube: “In the America we live in right now, that is the best that we can do until November.”
- Jul 24, 202621x their median
The corrupt Trump administration has just admitted to withholding taxpayer dollars from states based on how they voted. Last I checked we were a democracy, not a dictatorship. Where the hell is Congress?
- Jul 25, 202617x their median
.@POTUS: "I was disappointed that Gavin Newscum didn't show up... I heard that he recently said that 'we will lose our country if we don't fight fire with fire.' And, to be fair, there's only one thing we know about Gavin—and that's that he definitely doesn't want to fight fire with water."
- Jul 22, 20267.7x their median
Text no longer retained for this post.
- Oct 6, 20269.5x their median
The SILENCE from JD Vance and Marco Rubio today is deafening.
- Jul 17, 202617x their median
This is a 25th Amendment moment. I just watched the ramblings of a mad king and what else can I say — the only thing missing was tin foil. Donald Trump is trying to rig our elections and we have to stop him. Show up and VOTE this November. https://t.co/iAFPo9GIed
- Oct 12, 20267.5x their median
Trump is coming after anyone who dares stand up to him. He is a lawless president terrified of losing his grip on power. He must be stopped — VOTE!
- Aug 8, 20266.9x their median
This is how democracies rot. In the dead of night, the MAGA-controlled Senate bent the knee again — confirming Trump’s personal attorney as Attorney General. This is corruption on a staggering scale. There must be accountability — and reforms to ensure a lawless DOJ can NEVER happen again.
- Oct 15, 20266.2x their median
It’s good to know we can all agree they’ve “gone too far” when they want to execute someone live on TV. Resign, Pete Hegseth.
- Jul 28, 20266.0x their median
If SCOTUS caves to Trump and guts mail-in voting months before the midterms, it will throw our elections into chaos. That’s exactly what MAGA wants. The more Americans vote, the harder it is for Trump to cling to power. Show up. Vote. We can’t let them win.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.233%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 5.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 102K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is Gavin Newsom's engagement rate on X?
- Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) has an engagement rate of 0.233%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,153,829 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.233%, Gavin Newsom sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GavinNewsom have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GavinNewsom post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.