Back to @Gartner_inc's profile

Gartner engagement report

@Gartner_inc - 426K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 426K followers
Per impression
0.571%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
27
interactions (median)
Saved
0.275%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 426K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 385 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #gartnernewsroom.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gartner's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Gartner sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 202514x their median

    The Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2026 are here 💡 See how leading organizations are building resilience and trust in an AI-first world. Explore the strategies shaping tomorrow: https://t.co/i338WAQG1t #GartnerSYM #TechTrends #AI #CIO #Technology https://t.co/HgkaL8fubl

    222121231928K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20265.6x their median

    What does it take to prepare your organization for AI agents? Our most-liked webinar explores AI agent adoption, early implementation lessons and the technology foundations needed for success. Watch the on-demand session 👉 https://t.co/k4Onq7TMc1 https://t.co/1HPFHi2PBX

    119293112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.4x their median

    ♟️ AI is expanding the attack surface and strengthening defensive capabilities. That dual impact is forcing security leaders to rethink their approach. Learn how to secure and enable AI responsibly: https://t.co/7QA8fwzB2o https://t.co/rF0cnsf2NJ

    7117327.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.4x their median

    Your AI requires a boss 💼 Gartner finds that only 37% of low-maturity organizations have a dedicated AI leader, compared to 91% of high-maturity organizations. See all the benefits of having an AI leader here: https://t.co/MKaew28dgq https://t.co/04adTQoAoL

    6620325.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.9x their median

    AI coding agents are only as effective as the environment they operate in. Better documentation, stronger workflows and mature software delivery practices can make the difference between AI experiments and real productivity gains. Learn how to prepare your organization for successful AI agent adoption: https://t.co/D6WWmpAZou

    5522106.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.9x their median

    📈 Over 75% of organizations have started to integrate AI. However, as AI adoption accelerates—and agentic AI takes center stage—new ethical, governance, and business challenges are emerging ⚠️ For sustainable AI success, learn how to build a responsible AI program: https://t.co/tjpdE93pB7

    4825316.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.9x their median

    CMOs must close critical skills gaps to turn AI adoption into sustained value 📈 To close skills gaps quickly, CMOs should scale AI skills across three progressive altitudes that balance ⚡speed, ⚠️ risk and 💰 investment with marketing’s AI maturity: https://t.co/ei5wyY2c5s https://t.co/epKXJEPp8D

    5914139.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.5x their median

    Emerging technologies are redefining what is possible for enterprises. But value depends on how effectively you prioritize and apply them. Watch now and reveal the full radar: https://t.co/8J4xGISGSf https://t.co/novDi2VrrF

    5312215.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.2x their median

    By as early as 2029, low AI nativeness could end up costing your organization ⚠️ Learn how to assess, benchmark and accelerate toward AI-native business models before competitors gain the advantage: https://t.co/HSe7mua3Gx https://t.co/3YTrdcAJk0

    4112425.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.0x their median

    What will data and analytics look like in 2030? 💭 Data is becoming a core currency of value in AI-native enterprises. This on-demand webinar explores how leaders can build architectures and roadmaps for that future: https://t.co/yZocSXo3d6 https://t.co/mQR4qRBvsS

    3813205.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gartnernewsroom

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 27 interactions against 426K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.571% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.11% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 385 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Gartner's engagement rate on X?
Gartner (@Gartner_inc) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 425,513 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Gartner sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Gartner_inc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Gartner_inc post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going