Back to @GarbageHuman24's profile

Garbage Human engagement report

@GarbageHuman24 - 463K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.754%
of 463K followers
Per impression
7.11%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.22%
107 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.17/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3.5K interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.754%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 7.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 124K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Garbage Human's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.754%, Garbage Human sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 85 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202636x their median

    SHUT IT DOWN!!! https://t.co/YgiCQi2qY2

    107K14K2.6K7965.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202622x their median

    It might just be time to start burning books again https://t.co/9HPp6UY2Es

    67K3.3K3.5K7286.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202619x their median

    Diversity has arrived in Japan with predictable outcomes https://t.co/TmMgFM0I2l

    57K8.4K7092641.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202616x their median

    9 Years Today with my baby https://t.co/xOUirypsPm

    55K1.3K4772102.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202613x their median

    Just ordered a bunch of these stickers! Putting them everywhere! https://t.co/G4rS37zvzR

    35K3.6K4.3K2222.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202612x their median

    La realidad superando el cine. https://t.co/lwBHeqSFkq

    38K4.3K1721131.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202314x their median

    Name a famous historic battle without Googling

    15K44120K4.6K25M viewsView on X
  • Apr 18, 202611x their median

    Insane & relaxing toucan beak restoration rehab... https://t.co/HTIXOcTJ6F

    37K1.1K1391042.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20269.3x their median

    It took me 8 years but I finally broke the jeets https://t.co/HCigfV4MfS

    29K1.5K996170620K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20268.1x their median

    😭 https://t.co/9N4L7bJ0XP

    26K1.9K14558159K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.5K interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.754%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 7.11% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 124K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Garbage Human's engagement rate on X?
Garbage Human (@GarbageHuman24) has an engagement rate of 0.754%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 462,641 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.754%, Garbage Human sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GarbageHuman24 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GarbageHuman24 post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going