Garand Thumb engagement report
@GarandThumb1 - 574K followers on X
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 574K followers, an engagement rate of 0.699%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 3.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Garand Thumb's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.699%, Garand Thumb sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 57% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 1, 20265.8x their median
Botched execution again. Lol why are states so adverse to shooting people on death row. Shit. I’ll do it for free
- Aug 2, 20265.2x their median
boomers really be like this https://t.co/r5CODzmvhu
- Aug 13, 20264.7x their median
insane. Suppressors, SBR’s, SBS’s and AOW’s are no longer under the NFA
- Aug 2, 20264.3x their median
if anyone knows who he is and can put us in contact we’d love to have him out for a video https://t.co/l74aTNvM0k
- Sep 28, 20264.2x their median
Saw a interview where a guy asked a girl if she cared about the Holocaust and she said no. He replied, “you dont care about 7 million jews?” Man, that number keeps climbing ever year. CRAZY.
- Oct 7, 20264.0x their median
https://t.co/hvNQeWdBfx
- Sep 13, 20263.8x their median
Mike Johnson Stands by Texas GOP Nominee Who Called Children “Cum Trophies” — CNN https://t.co/xV4xBrkEJI
- Aug 31, 20263.7x their median
People big mad we showed Swastika in our latest video. We aspire to a less reverent humor back when everything was fair game. People are getting way too soft.
- Aug 2, 20263.6x their median
got contact with Jordan we’ll see if he’s able to come over for a video! https://t.co/wQ6MI9Mrl8
- Aug 21, 20263.5x their median
Being called a Nazi is a cool way of letting you know that you are getting on <their> nerves
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 574K followers, an engagement rate of 0.699%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 3.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 10% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
- What is Garand Thumb's engagement rate on X?
- Garand Thumb (@GarandThumb1) has an engagement rate of 0.699%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 574,260 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.699%, Garand Thumb sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @GarandThumb1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @GarandThumb1 post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.