Back to @GMOFreeUSA's profile

GMO/Toxin Free USA engagement report

@GMOFreeUSA - 123K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 123K followers
Per impression
3.51%
883 views on a typical post
Reach
0.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
31
interactions (median)
Saved
0.34%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 123K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 883 times each, and 3.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.716% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 136 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tag: #glyphosate.

Compared with accounts its own size

GMO/Toxin Free USA's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, GMO/Toxin Free USA sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 825 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 20264.4x their median

    Love pistachios? Take a closer look at how they’re grown. 🌱 ❌ Wonderful Pistachios belongs to The Wonderful Company, which Mother Jones identified as California’s largest glyphosate user in 2023. Its investigation reported approximately 328,000 pounds used, which is about 68% more than the next-largest user. ✅ Braga Organic Farms offers a different approach: certified organic pistachios grown without glyphosate, which is prohibited in organic production. Here’s why we’re choosing Braga: 🌱 Certified organic by CCOF Braga has held organic certification for more than 25 years showing their commitment to organic farming. 🚜 Family-grown in California Their family farm grows pistachios on 40 acres in Madera, California, with the option to buy directly from the farmer. 🥣 Options for every snack preference Choose in-shell pistachios or convenient shelled kernels. In-shell varieties include raw, roasted unsalted, and roasted salted. 🧂 Simple ingredients Their roasted-and-salted in-shell pistachios are dry-roasted with sea salt, without added oil. Ready to make the swap? Find the organic pistachios here: https://t.co/whEmrJXKYT We may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. #Pistachios #Organic

    9139423.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.3x their median

    WATCH the video exposing Driscoll's: https://t.co/jy5efX35tQ SIGN THE PETITION: https://t.co/RDc37v3iJd Driscoll’s Ex-Employee Blows Whistle & Sues Company: David Harada discovered Driscoll’s contracted farmers were applying pesticides above the legal limits. His director of agronomy asked, “Do we have plausible deniability regarding this issue?” “I was completely dumbfounded, mostly because the first words that I expected out of the director's mouth was, ‘How do we fix this?’ Not, ‘How do we hide this?’ It's hard to live with myself knowing that that's still ongoing. I've seen enough bad things that have happened on Driscoll's berries to know that I probably won't touch one for the rest of my life.” Neither should you. BOYCOTT DRISCOLL'S until they change their immoral practices. Stop harming children and communities with toxic pesticides. Stop greenwashing. Stop lying.

    8343431.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.6x their median

    The Bill Gates Foundation’s Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA): 20 Years. $1.5 Billion Spent. GMO. Corn Monocultures. Synthetic Fertilizers. Toxic Pesticides. That was the farming system they told Africans would cut hunger in half and would build wealth for farmers. Except it didn't... 20 years ago, AGRA, led by the Bill Gates Foundation, launched with a promise: commercial seed, synthetic fertilizer and better market access would lift yields, raise incomes and cut hunger across the continent. As AGRA marks that 20th anniversary with a continent-wide celebration tour, a new report from the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA) puts that promise against the record — and finds it broken. The Green Revolution Has Failed Africa: Twenty Years of Evidence and What Works Instead is the most detailed independent assessment yet of what two decades and billions of philanthropic dollars actually bought the 13 countries AGRA prioritized. The numbers are stark. The count of chronically undernourished people across those countries has risen 58% since 2006 — nearly double the 31% increase already flagged in an earlier assessment in 2020. That’s against a program that set out, explicitly, to cut hunger in half. But Senegal, a West African country that was never part of the AGRA program, was able to cut hunger in half using agroecological concepts, diversified farming systems and reducing reliance on inputs. Bill Gates' industrial agriculture system of expensive magic seeds, synthetic fertilizers and pesticides has failed spectacularly. "Green Revolution"? More like devolution. The only ones that benefited were the corporations selling the patented seeds, fertilizers and pesticides. AGRA and the Gates Foundation should be bowing their heads in shame, not going on a celebration tour. READ the report: https://t.co/0YYBO9ZolE

    5841661.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.6x their median

    Groundbreaking New Study: For decades, the debate over glyphosate’s health effects has largely played out through epidemiology, animal models, and cell-culture experiments. What has been missing is direct evidence of the herbicide sitting inside the human organs where hormone-driven cancers actually develop. A new cross-sectional study out of Semmelweis University and the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, published in Toxicology Reports, closes part of that gap, and the findings are hard to ignore. The results mark a genuine first: this is among the earliest studies to detect and quantify glyphosate directly in human endometrial tissue. Two findings stand out. First, glyphosate concentrations in endometrial tissue were consistently and significantly higher than in blood serum, across every group studied, cancer patients and healthy controls alike. In other words, the womb appears to hold onto glyphosate at levels blood tests alone would never reveal. Second, when the researchers isolated patients with high-grade endometrial cancer, the most aggressive and dangerous form, both their serum and tissue glyphosate levels were significantly elevated compared with the control group. Patients with low-grade cancer or precancerous lesions did not show the same statistically significant elevation, suggesting the association strengthens with tumor severity. READ more: Glyphosate Found Trapped in Womb Tissue — And It's Highest in the Most Aggressive Cancers - @SustainablePuls https://t.co/SiyJQuFH8d

    6245042.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.4x their median

    STOP SYNGENTA INTERNATIONAL DAY OF ACTION OCTOBER 3 , 2026 On October 3, people around the world are taking action against one of the world’s biggest pesticide companies. If you’ve never heard of SYNGENTA, we’re putting this China-owned company, the world’s number one pesticide seller, on your radar. Bayer-Monsanto has become infamous the world over because of its GMO crops and related pesticides, particularly glyphosate. But before glyphosate, Syngenta’s ultra-toxic atrazine was America’s most-used herbicide. Today, atrazine, banned in over 60 countries and even restricted in China, is still the second most widely used herbicide in the U.S. Syngenta has the largest portfolio of poisons of any of the Big Four agrichemical giants, including Bayer-Monsanto, BASF, and Corteva. On Saturday, October 3, 2026, you’ll have the opportunity to learn about the activities of this evil enterprise. How do Syngenta’s chemicals impact our environment… and our health? What does the peer-reviewed science show? What does Syngenta do to scientists who find their pesticides are dangerous? Learn about this and more as organizations around the world come together to call out this pesticide giant. Remember those good old Twitter Storms back in the early 2010’s? Hashtag #StopSyngenta – We’ll be flooding social media (Facebook, Instagram, X, and Bluesky) on Saturday. Learn what you need to know about Syngenta in our social media posts at 8AM, 10AM, 12PM, 4PM, 6PM, and 8PM, all Eastern Timezone. Let’s turn up the volume until everyone knows the name SYNGENTA—and what’s behind it. If you are in Europe, LEARN MORE and participate: https://t.co/rHAwnWUkTc – There will be meetings/protests in Warfield, UK; Brussels, Belgium; St-Pierre-la-Garenne, France; Basel & Monthey, Switzerland; and in Argentina, Indonesia and Pakistan. Not there. Not here. Not anywhere, The GMO/Toxin Free USA

    6135631.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.8x their median

    Nearly all tested cat foods contain toxic plastic contaminants, the herbicide glyphosate and heavy metals such as lead, mercury and arsenic, according to a new investigation provided exclusively to CNN. https://t.co/7Uevf89Aoh

    4732071.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.8x their median

    Unfortunately, the Trump administration approved the continued use of the pesticide atrazine, manufactured by ChemChina-Syngenta, after a Fish and Wildlife Service review concluded wrongly that it does not pose an extinction risk to endangered animals and plants in the U.S. That decision now clears another major step for the EPA to continue allowing the pesticide to be used across American farms. Atrazine, a pesticide so toxic that it has the ability to turn male frogs into females, has been banned by more than 60 countries, including China, yet it is the second most widely used herbicide in the U.S., trailing only glyphosate. The new atrazine review goes against what the EPA said in 2021, warning that the pesticide could harm more than 1,000 protected animal and plant species across the country. Studies also link atrazine to birth defects, fertility issues and several types of cancer, posing risks to humans as well. Because the pesticide industry has full control over the White House and all of our regulatory agencies, we will not see health-protective actions on pesticides from this administration. Despite all of the campaign promises, what we'll see is more pesticide approvals and more poison in our food, water and environment. The Trump administration continues to throw Americans under the bus to help foreign corporations profit from selling toxic pesticides. AMERICA FIRST? NOT EVEN CLOSE. Tell the White House and Congress that this is not acceptable. They must direct the EPA to join the rest of the world in banning atrazine. We elect our legislators to represent us and not corporations. They must be told they will suffer the consequences in forthcoming election cycles if they continue working against our health and best interests. https://t.co/XRCNLHhcx5

    5031231.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    EPA Fraud: From a 25-year EPA employee who worked on pesticides... confirmation of what our common sense has already told us. The corruption runs deep and long. He witnessed it in the 1980s and it continues today. We must take heed of Dr. Evaggelos Vallianatos' assessment of our current state of affairs. He cautions us to the fact that the previous administration has dragged EPA to its lowest standing since its creation in December 1970. It declared war on science and environmental protection, sending a message of rapacious pollution to farmers, petroleum men, the industry, miners and exploiters of the natural world. But the corruption of EPA management and collusion with the polluting industries is ongoing. The current EPA, led by Lee Zeldin, protects corporate profits, not human or environmental health. Americans suffer and disease rates continue to rise, while the polluters make billions. We need to fire the entire management class at the EPA and reform the agency from top to bottom. Be sure to read about his first-hand experience at the EPA: Is Environmental Protection Possible? https://t.co/zZhxCgCBlg

    4927151.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.5x their median

    John Abbotts, a former scientist with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reflects on his time at the agency... "What I learned at the agency was that even when data indicated a need for risk reduction, up to and including cancellation of a pesticide use, such actions were too often avoided. In our work assessing risk through dietary exposure to pesticides, it was not difficult to refine different levels of analyses and I learned of one case where a high-level director in the re-registration division asked if the risk numbers could be reduced. Such pressure for results that avoided restrictions on certain pesticides led me to learn that if you tell a chemical company “No” too often, you hurt your chances for promotion. During a meeting on my division’s reorganization with managers present, I commented that my proudest moments at the agency’s Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) had been when my work supported agency negotiations with companies that led to pesticide risk reductions; but I wanted more of those moments. In 1998, frustrated by OPP’s unwillingness to cancel old, dangerous pesticides, in part due to pressures from a Republican Congress, I left for a position as research scientist with the University of Washington School of Public Health in Seattle, where I still reside." READ the rest: https://t.co/XiWnX6lqCD

    432841858 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.2x their median

    The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit against the city of Jackson, Mississippi, which alleged the city knowingly let residents drink lead-contaminated water. The lawsuit, first filed in 2022, says the contamination violated Jacksonians’ constitutional right to bodily integrity. Judge Kurt Engelhardt disagreed. “The Constitution does not provide redress for every governmental wrongdoing,” Engelhardt said. “Defendants’ actions allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of clean water and guileless information. These deprivations, while grievous, do not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.” That may be true in Mississippi—but on the state level in at least nine US states, and in more than a dozen other countries, clean drinking water is in fact a protected right. New York’s state constitution, as of a 2021 amendment, states that “each person shall have a right to clean air and water, and a healthful environment.” So too in Massachusetts, where “the right to clean air and water” has been constitutionally protected since 1972. Mississippians: It's time to amend the state constitution. https://t.co/uJJSbXXqyS

    4322221.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#glyphosate

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 31 interactions against 123K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 883 times each, and 3.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.716% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 136 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

What is GMO/Toxin Free USA's engagement rate on X?
GMO/Toxin Free USA (@GMOFreeUSA) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 123,349 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, GMO/Toxin Free USA sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GMOFreeUSA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GMOFreeUSA post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going