Back to @GE_Aerospace's profile

GE Aerospace engagement report

@GE_Aerospace - 293K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 293K followers
Per impression
1.49%
8.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 293K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #geaerospace, #avgeeks, #aviation.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #geaerospace, #avgeeks, #aviation.

Compared with accounts its own size

GE Aerospace's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, GE Aerospace sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 339 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202614x their median

    The next generation of propulsion is taking shape. Our XA102 adaptive cycle engine is advancing under the U.S. Air Force’s Next Generation Adaptive Propulsion program. With prototype hardware on order and subcomponent testing underway, we’re turning digital designs into physical hardware, and helping shape the future of airpower. Built on decades of innovation. Driven by tomorrow’s mission. 🔗 https://t.co/V1FCknPDdF

    1.5K165181649K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202610x their median

    Big fan. Literally. 🌀 #GE90 #GEAerospace https://t.co/iDpmXC6m3j

    1.1K13713417K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20269.0x their median

    What was old is new again! See our Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhaust Nozzle (AVEN) technology, first demonstrated on the F110 engine in the 1990s, as it comes back to life for @shieldaitech AI’s X-BAT and helps advance autonomous flight. #FutureOfFlight #Defense https://t.co/Jbj3h9TGvv

    96111217832K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20268.5x their median

    NEWS 📰 GE Aerospace and @shieldaitech have successfully completed integration, actuation, and engine light-off testing of the advanced Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhaust Nozzle (AVEN) for Shield AI’s X-BAT aircraft, a critical milestone in the program's path to vertical flight. Engineers from both companies modified and integrated the AVEN into GE Aerospace's F110-GE-129E engine, then completed functional checkouts and engine light-off to verify system performance at GE Aerospace's test operations site in Peebles, Ohio. Learn more: https://t.co/z7Y0G2JHO3

    849146222140K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20267.8x their median

    Certified: 🔟 The 737-10 has received FAA certification, marking a major milestone for Boeing and the development team that brought the final member of the 737 MAX family to this point. ✈️Strong fuel efficiency for denser markets ✈️Greater flexibility for airlines serving high-demand routes ✈️Commonality across the 737 MAX family Congratulations to #TeamBoeing and our partners who developed the 737-10 over many years, and guided it through extensive testing, evaluation and certification. Thank you to our customers who are building the future with the 737-10 and 737 MAX family. More: https://t.co/MNVFhcldBS

    772139212119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.1x their median

    GE Aerospace is proud to partner with @BETA_aircraft to advance mission-critical technologies that are helping redefine the future of flight. The MV250 aircraft's turbogenerator unlocks distributed electric propulsion with the endurance to go the distance, tapping into existing gas turbine infrastructure and capabilities. We're excited to bring our hybrid electric propulsion solutions to this platform—enabling greater payload, range, and speed, and delivering an important new capability for military customers. https://t.co/2ZnDuQQiYl #FIA2026 #GEAerospaceFIA

    429614216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20265.4x their median

    It’s day 2️⃣ from the Farnborough International Airshow and the future of flight is on full display! ✈ #FIA2026 #GEAerospaceFIA https://t.co/5NdGREdUMr

    389623214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.5x their median

    Innovative by design, built to deliver for the customer, the #GE9X reflects the engineering that’s shaping the #FutureOfFlight. ✈ #GEAerospace #Aviation https://t.co/737Uk3wHke

    375505313K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.2x their median

    Happy #TravelTuesday! There’s nothing like seeing #GEAerospace engines on wing. 😍 #CF6 #Aviation https://t.co/TLilYKmifM

    341409211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.2x their median

    “We are not simply building engines. We are helping people reunite with loved ones, pursue opportunities, explore new places, and create memories that last a lifetime.” In our latest Quick Six, engineering leader Marta Wąsik reflects on innovation, customer impact, and what it means to shape the future of flight. Read the full story: https://t.co/le7Pii85pL #GEAerospace #FutureOfFlight #Aviation #Engineering

    345358111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#geaerospace#avgeeks#aviation#cfmleap#cfmrise

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 293K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.2K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #geaerospace, #avgeeks, #aviation.

What is GE Aerospace's engagement rate on X?
GE Aerospace (@GE_Aerospace) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 292,987 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, GE Aerospace sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @GE_Aerospace have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @GE_Aerospace post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going