Back to @FutSheriff's profile

Fut Sheriff engagement report

@FutSheriff - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 361 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.118%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.966%
186K views on a typical post
Reach
12.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
49 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
17.1/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 361 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 186K times each, and 0.966% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 17.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 361 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #totw, #potm.

Measured over 361 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #fc27, #totw, #potm.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fut Sheriff's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.118%, Fut Sheriff sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    Raphinha when itโ€™s time to play for Barcelona https://t.co/zG5lmuJbXo

    33K1.0K2514305K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202617x their median

    Oyarzabal when itโ€™s time to play for Spain https://t.co/BBiiOc3W5r

    29K9062016356K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202616x their median

    He got downgraded but his card is actually better????? ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/YiSiFS1eNp

    28K3544013650K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202613x their median

    There was a timeโ€ฆ https://t.co/f1iyUFU14e

    23K4418255588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202613x their median

    the nastiest goal you will see ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿช„ #fc27 https://t.co/dW4aLP9edc

    21K82935385210M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202613x their median

    Life when they were the same person https://t.co/IkJmpmiS4Z

    23K4492020467K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202612x their median

    Most Broken base cards in FIFA history Agree? https://t.co/RflUUB0lSS

    20K3026192283.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202612x their median

    Bring back the colors man Look how shit it is nowadays https://t.co/JnZMhM8Pax

    20K4755825966K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202611x their median

    Time flies huh https://t.co/V8cjul2txK

    19K2713013592K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202611x their median

    Streets wonโ€™t forget Piemonte Calcio https://t.co/a0z3gqrKvK

    19K4672111313K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fc27#totw#potm#bundesliga#fc26

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 361 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 186K times each, and 0.966% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 17.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 361 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fc27, #totw, #potm.

What is Fut Sheriff's engagement rate on X?
Fut Sheriff (@FutSheriff) has an engagement rate of 0.118%, based on the median interactions across 361 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,526,064 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.118%, Fut Sheriff sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FutSheriff have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FutSheriff post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 17.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going