Back to @Fundeu's profile

FundéuRAE engagement report

@Fundeu - 309K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 309K followers
Per impression
0.499%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 309K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.499% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.843% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #recofundéu, #blogfundéu, #hoytambiénsehablade.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #recofundéu, #blogfundéu, #hoytambiénsehablade.

Compared with accounts its own size

FundéuRAE's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, FundéuRAE sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link87% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 87% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20263.7x their median

    El adjetivo «exuberante» y el sustantivo «exuberancia» se escriben sin hache entre la «x» y la «u», por lo que no resultan apropiadas las grafías «exhuberante» y «exhuberancia». #recoFundéu https://t.co/UtH5q4Zrm6 https://t.co/QmIB2uEGh3

    389015.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.0x their median

    Cuando se utiliza el verbo «revestir» para señalar que algo tiene importancia o gravedad, lo indicado es no utilizar la preposición «de» para introducir esas cualidades. #recoFundéu ❌ La lesión reviste de gravedad ✅ La lesión reviste gravedad https://t.co/ywhOlRbYEs https://t.co/SqiT5Czaz1

    2613002.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.7x their median

    🗨️Cuando el complemento del verbo «hablar» es una oración con «que», lo indicado es no prescindir de la preposición «de»: ❎alguien habla de que ocurre algo ❌alguien habla que ocurre algo https://t.co/05DmXtPN3N https://t.co/6pyAPcxmiF

    2310026.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.6x their median

    La locución «in fraganti» se escribe sin ningún tipo de resalte, es decir, sin comillas ni cursiva. #recoFundéu https://t.co/wYxQBq8RYl https://t.co/rroDH6qalP

    284205.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.6x their median

    La expresión «en comparación» puede ir seguida de las preposiciones «con» y «a», pero no «de». #recoFundéu ❌ Era más alto en comparación de los otros ✅ Era más alto en comparación con/a los otros https://t.co/XR8W6VhBMe https://t.co/K8UaCqXVn9

    286004.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.5x their median

    La forma indicada de la expresión usada en referencia a lo que es inútil o no tiene justificación es «en balde», con «b», y no «en valde». #recoFundéu https://t.co/o8UZkMhaDn https://t.co/jLEfQehOdQ

    249003.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.5x their median

    Las voces «tirolina» y «tirolesa» son alternativas válidas en español a los extranjerismos «zip line» y «canopy» para aludir al sistema de cuerdas o cables por los que alguien puede deslizarse. #recoFundéu https://t.co/i9QQNIDV5k https://t.co/nr8XQYvgSZ

    245124.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.4x their median

    En la construcción «ser capaz de», el adjetivo «capaz» concuerda con el sujeto. #recoFundéu ❌ Nosotros somos capaz de todo ✅ Nosotros somos capaces de todo https://t.co/cLuGfP5yZe https://t.co/LWMVzTYaYv

    256004.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.4x their median

    📈 Sustantivos como «zigzag», «chachachá», «gluglú» y otros semejantes, formados por repetición de una sílaba (a veces con cambio vocálico), se escriben en una sola palabra. #recoFundéu ✅el zigzag ❌el zig-zag ❌el zig, zag https://t.co/MAvj7qn3ly https://t.co/8cettrh6D1

    229004.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.3x their median

    La locución «a cuál más», en la que hay dos tildes, puede ir seguida de un adjetivo en singular, no en plural, sin intercalar la preposición «de». #recoFundéu ❌a cuál más divertidas ❌a cuál más de divertida ✅ a cuál más divertida https://t.co/WyYUp42GCP https://t.co/Bv1smxsdj1

    246002.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#recofundéu#blogfundéu#hoytambiénsehablade#hoynosconsultan#alquiler

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 309K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.499% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.843% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #recofundéu, #blogfundéu, #hoytambiénsehablade.

What is FundéuRAE's engagement rate on X?
FundéuRAE (@Fundeu) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 308,716 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, FundéuRAE sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fundeu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fundeu post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going