Back to @FreddyLA7's profile

Freddy🇩🇪 engagement report

@FreddyLA7 - 757K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.75%
of 757K followers
Per impression
4.04%
515K views on a typical post
Reach
68.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
172 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 21K interactions against 757K followers, an engagement rate of 2.75%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 515K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 68.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 114K interactions, about 5.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Freddy🇩🇪's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.75%, Freddy🇩🇪 sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 230 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 20265.5x their median

    We’re planning another USA trip this fall!🇺🇸 It’s going to be a road trip with college football as the main focus, but we’re also planning to check out plenty of other sports and unique American events. The idea for this trip actually came from our visits to a few colleges on the last trip. Everyone told us how crazy it gets on gamedays, so now we want to experience it ourselves. Now we need your expertise: Which colleges should we visit? What games are interesting? And what other events or activities (also non sporting related) are worth checking out in September/October? So far we have these on our list: - Oktoberfest in Helen, GA - Texas State Fair - Breeders' Cup in Kentucky

    91K3.2K18K1.5K13M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20265.4x their median

    Last evening in America💔 https://t.co/OV0fpIbfy2

    105K2.2K4.0K207995K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20264.5x their median

    Our first MLS game ever. Nashville against Atlanta. We had regular seats, but then the owner of the club invited us up to his suite to watch the game there. It‘s so insane how nice everyone has been to us in this country.🇺🇸 https://t.co/gl4BsLBv7V

    90K2.3K8581513.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.2x their median

    Ending the trip in the nations capital🇺🇸 https://t.co/dzLeARuQq0

    84K2.4K1.4K1541.5M viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20264.1x their median

    Frustration dinner. https://t.co/8DiYEkEKdD

    80K8541.6K2443.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 20264.0x their median

    We’re watching the France vs Spain match with very nice people here in the middle of nowhere in Tennessee who invited us to their ranch. Later we might shoot some guns. https://t.co/vIsgu89790

    79K1.9K949881.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.9x their median

    Tennessee❤️ When people told us at the beginning of our road trip that people in the South are different, we didn’t really know what they meant. But after spending several weeks here, we finally understand. The hospitality here is just something else. Everyone knows everyone, and it feels like people are living one big shared life. Someone is always stopping by, doors are always open, and everyone is welcome. One guy told us he hasn’t locked his house in 23 years. When we were out on the lake, we met some people who immediately invited us to their lake house to hang out. They offered us drinks, chicken wings, and made us feel completely at home. It’s a kind of hospitality I’ve never experienced before. When we got back to the dock late that night, one of the guys on the boat said something that really stuck with me: “You don’t have to live in some big, exciting city. What matters is the people who live there. That’s what makes you happy. I’ve lived in many places around the world, but nothing comes close to Ocoee, Tennessee. And you know the best part about living here? We’re going to do the exact same thing again tomorrow.” We will be back.

    75K3.7K1.4K3322.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.7x their median

    Now that the trip is almost over, I want to answer one of the questions we’ve been asked the most: “How are you guys able to afford a trip like this?” The answer is actually pretty simple. We saved up for this trip over the past year, and it wasn’t nearly as expensive as most people probably assume. We stayed mostly in budget hotels, and always split the cost between the three of us. Our flight to the US was also only 255€ for example. The biggest expenses were the rental cars and World Cup tickets. In total the 6 weeks here with everything combined probably cost around 6-7k (It‘s probably 6k but since we also saved money thanks to invitations like the hotel stay in Houston, let‘s say it would’ve been around 7k). I know that’s still a lot of money, but it’s nowhere near what some people seemed to think we were spending. We met other World Cup tourists who told us their trips cost more than $40,000. If you‘re ok with not living in luxury than travelling doesn‘t need to be this expensive. I’ll calculate the exact total once I’m back home.

    72K2.1K1.7K1342.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20263.6x their median

    One last dance https://t.co/jDyQ7Xy0dV

    72K1.2K1.2K1591.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.4x their median

    HOLY FUCKING SHIT FREEEEEDOMMMM!!!!🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://t.co/IRqvuWzRax

    68K2.4K1.2K2662.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21K interactions against 757K followers, an engagement rate of 2.75%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 515K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 68.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 114K interactions, about 5.5x its own typical post.

What is Freddy🇩🇪's engagement rate on X?
Freddy🇩🇪 (@FreddyLA7) has an engagement rate of 2.75%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 756,843 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.75%, Freddy🇩🇪 sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FreddyLA7 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FreddyLA7 post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going