Back to @FrankieBorrelli's profile

Frankie Borrelli engagement report

@FrankieBorrelli - 292K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 292K followers
Per impression
0.786%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
5.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.786% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Frankie Borrelli's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Frankie Borrelli sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,816 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 91 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 7, 2023166x their median

    If I’m swinging it well, I don’t take divots… https://t.co/WS7N63LZiW

    19K7863131208.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202653x their median

    Looks like @wesleybryangolf either forgot to sign into his burner account or he’s no longer a man of God. Tough situation either way. https://t.co/zJI70pX82L

    6.0K38343231.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202612x their median

    Agree with this take. The inconsistency around who gets the rules enforced is brutal. The best players in the field have slow motion 4k zoomed in cameras on every shot.. and if they’re finding rule infractions based off that footage, that’s crazy. https://t.co/RNMIJlUj98

    3.0K801003355K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20264.9x their median

    Anders Lee.. Mr Quadzilla himself. Thank you Cap. A true Isles legend and one of the nicest guys you’ll ever meet. Represented the island better than anyone. https://t.co/0SwgM3wQqm

    1.2K27295184K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20269.8x their median

    DISGUSTING! 19 YEARS OLD! HOW DID WE GET THIS LUCKY?! https://t.co/9XuurMGUFr

    1.2K15262136K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20264.1x their median

    Kiz reveals the Top 5 PGA Tour players he’d most want to grab a beer with https://t.co/x1lrUbSV3a

    1.0K13253484K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.1x their median

    How come Long Island has never produced an elite PGA Tour golfer? Like a real top of the world player. 144 golf courses with 8 in the top 100 (which doesn’t even include courses like Meadow Brook, The Creek, Glen Oaks, Deepdale, The Bridge… the list goes on and on) .. my point is, we have arguably the best golf in the world.. and I would have to assume the kids growing up at these clubs have the most access to the best teachers and facilities in the world. it makes no sense to me.

    7341023513501K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.0x their median

    Can you name the top 10 Right Handed Home Run Hitters since 2020? https://t.co/lk9roN3EC4

    64857012684K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.7x their median

    https://t.co/CXW4kyLbpA

    535930228K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.1x their median

    Bryson having a full blown temper tantrum right now is incredible TV. So many hand motions.

    45515943112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 292K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.786% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 166x its own typical post.

What is Frankie Borrelli's engagement rate on X?
Frankie Borrelli (@FrankieBorrelli) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 292,178 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Frankie Borrelli sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,816 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FrankieBorrelli have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FrankieBorrelli post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going