Fran Altomare engagement report
@FranAltomare - 235K followers on X
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #garlasco.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fran Altomare's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.082%, Fran Altomare sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 98% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 24, 20239.3x their median
Da quando ho iniziato a rispondere a qualche Creator ed Influencer di Instagram, solitamente per far emergere contenuti improbabili, competenze inesistenti e opinioni discutibili, vengo accusato di far partire “shitstorm”. Anime belle, non funziona così. La maggior parte degli influencer - io non mi ritengo parte della categoria, perché, al massimo, vi influenzo sull’andare a comprare merce da Angela e Bella Fisica - gode di un privilegio: una platea senza contraddittorio in cui l’unica possibilità di discussione è un box di commenti - pubblico o privato, spesso moderato - molte volte neanche considerato. Se hai 200.000 followers e te la prendi ingiustamente con una realtà che ne ha 1.000, cercare un contraddittorio su un terreno numericamente paritario (o quasi) è doveroso. Se in un video da mezzo milione di views dici che le donne devono darla via in cambio di una borsa per comprendere il loro potere, è normale aspettarsi che qualcuno non sia d’accordo. Soprattutto se vendi dei corsi in cui ti spacci per una “love coach” e provi a sostituirti a psicologi e terapeuti. Se in un video dici di essere un maestro di stile, ma storicamente compri merce contraffatta, ironizzare sul tuo personaggio è legittimo. Se in un video dici che nella tua azienda non si riposa mai perché solo Dio può riposare, è doveroso far notare che hai un modo di vedere il lavoro totalmente fuori dal tempo. Se in un video mangi carne di pollo cruda e dai consigli su come proteggerti dal sole usando il burro chiarificato, è letteralmente un dovere combattere la disinformazione che fai davanti a (centinaia di) migliaia di persone. Che magari ti credono. Usi un elicottero per gettare coriandoli in occasione della prima comunione di tua figlia? Che ci resti almeno il diritto di riderne. Poi, non sono (siamo) infallibili e ci riserviamo anche il diritto di perculare per molto meno. Prima o poi sbaglierò anche io, così come ho già fatto in passato. Capita. Sono io la persona giusta per far emergere quanto detto? Non credo sia rilevante, di base esercito solo un diritto: quello di dire ciò che penso. Anche se questo attira una mole di insulti mica da ridere. Ma va bene così. Tutto questo solo per dire che non qui tutti hanno gli strumenti per comprendere davvero i contenuti proposti da chi ha un grande pubblico. Soprattutto se non si è familiari al concetto di responsabilità. Ciao!
- Aug 30, 20268.0x their median
Eh, grazie al cazzo. https://t.co/MLmGSJRG3W
- Sep 2, 20266.2x their median
Scusaci Rebecca se respiriamo la tua stessa aria. https://t.co/EhN4NcrNsC
- Sep 5, 20266.0x their median
Ho baciato la mia commercialista per gli auguri di Natale con più trasporto di loro. https://t.co/p8dKaoeFe8
- Sep 5, 20265.5x their median
Il pianto a secco di lui. Wanna Marchi aveva ragione. https://t.co/n7vfrTzXlp
- Sep 13, 20263.4x their median
Non credo dormirò stanotte. https://t.co/8uVsRh330F
- Sep 23, 20263.4x their median
La quantità di luci accese in pieno giorno. E comunque al buio resta. https://t.co/IpfWo8KFFF
- Aug 31, 20263.3x their median
Qualcuno lo porti via da lì. https://t.co/S0Jkc9HUGe
- Sep 5, 20263.2x their median
Gli americani sono un esperimento sociale, parte 121.577.001. https://t.co/vgvcWfXLTF
- Sep 19, 20263.1x their median
Cancelliamo il bollo auto ma lo Stato recuperi tassando chiunque tamburelli con le unghie sugli oggetti. https://t.co/xwSPefwvtF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 235K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.713% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 9.3x its own typical post.
- What is Fran Altomare's engagement rate on X?
- Fran Altomare (@FranAltomare) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 234,989 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.082%, Fran Altomare sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FranAltomare have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FranAltomare post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.