Back to @FourFourTwo's profile

FourFourTwo engagement report

@FourFourTwo - 480K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 480K followers
Per impression
0.039%
5.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 264 interactions, about 132x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FourFourTwo's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, FourFourTwo sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,985 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,906 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link93% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 93% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 362 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026132x their median

    🇧🇷🇧🇬🇪🇸 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗸𝗼𝘃 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗮 🗣️ "We have been well and truly slaughtered." 🤷‍♂️ November 2, 1994. Alex Ferguson stood in the bowels of the Camp Nou, completely stripped of excuses. No rants about the referee. No bemoaning bad luck. No complaints about the foreigner rule that forced Peter Schmeichel into the stands. Just total, unadulterated acceptance. 😱 Barcelona had just dismantled Manchester United 4-0 in a performance of such brutal, breathtaking beauty that the only logical response was submission. So traumatising was the night that Paul Parker still refuses to step foot inside the Camp Nou. Gary Pallister walked off the pitch completely shell-shocked, admitting he couldn't get anywhere near his opponents. United’s defense spent 90 minutes auditioning for the role of Juliet: Romario, Romario, wherefore art thou Romario? And nobody had a clue where Hristo Stoichkov was. 🧨 At the epicenter of the destruction was the most dashing, volatile, and intoxicating strike partnership on the planet. 🌪️ Fresh off dominating the 1994 World Cup in the USA, Romario and Stoichkov were two absolute force-of-nature talents. The Brazilian was a "cartoon footballer"—a box-office magician who bent time and space with delicate vaselinas and his iconic cola de vaca (cow’s tail) turn. The Bulgarian was a ferocious predator powered by pure mala leche (bad milk)—a wild, terrifying edge that saw him stamp on referees, kick seven-year-olds out of training for wearing Real Madrid shirts, and run like Carl Lewis. 😈 Cruyff brought Stoichkov to Catalonia specifically because Barcelona had "too many nice guys." They needed a devil. 🗒️ On paper, pairing them together was a guaranteed explosion. When Romario signed from PSV, Stoichkov publicly called the board "stupid" for buying him. Both were ego-driven, fiercely competitive, and utterly convinced the team existed solely to serve them. Yet, against every law of footballing friction, they became inseparable. 💜 Their wives became best friends. Stoichkov played bouncer at the hospital when Romario’s son was born—punching a photographer to protect the family’s privacy—and ultimately became the boy's Godfather. On the pitch, they shredded defenses across Europe, firing Barça to a dramatic La Liga title and scoring over 50 goals between them in a single season. 💔 They did it all. They became legends. And then, as fast as the flame ignited, it burnt out. 💃 The demolition of Manchester United was supposed to be a warning—a glimpse into a future where Stoichkov and Romario ruled the world. Instead, it was the ultimate last waltz. 🗞️ Six months earlier, a 4-0 European Cup final defeat to Milan in Athens had quietly fractured Johan Cruyff’s "Dream Team." Defeating United was merely the grand finale before the inevitable implosion. Romario’s nocturnal habits, missed training sessions, and love for Rio's nightlife began to alienate the squad. Tabloids, mistresses, red cards, missed phone calls, and toxic entourages drove a wedge between the two friends. 👻 Following the 1994 World Cup, Romario returned to Spain two weeks late, a ghost of his former self. Within months of humiliating Ferguson’s United, Romario was gone. Stoichkov followed shortly after, declaring "It’s Cruyff or me." Laudrup, Zubizarreta, and Cruyff himself soon exited through the same door. 🔝 Ask any Blaugrana fan to name the top ten players in the club's history, and both men will make the cut. Their impact was so monumental, their reverence so deep, that it feels impossible they only played together for little over a single year. 👌 It was desperately short-lived—a chaotic year of kidnapping, punch-ups, tears, tantrums, and staggering genius. But on that crisp November night in 1994, before the fame, ego, and fallouts tore it all down, Romario and Stoichkov gave the world one final, perfect recital. 📚 Read the story in full https://t.co/rvuXgdrZPa

    209435773K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202630x their median

    ✍️ Next time an Arsenal, Chelsea or Spurs supporter wakes up on Sunday morning in a Newcastle hotel room with a traffic cone, half a kebab down his shirt and absolutely no recollection of getting back there, perhaps he should observe a moment of gratitude. Kevin Keegan made this possible @northumbriana How KK invented the Premier League’s best away day https://t.co/OfVgS9iGmn

    4874019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    The Dane would win three league titles during his 12-year stint at Liverpool https://t.co/KT5S3WL8y2

    2313127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    🏆 The story of the missing Ballon d’Or – and proof Robert Lewandowski should have won it This year marks the 70th edition of the famous award, but official records show the prize has only been handed out 69 times... 🧵👇 🦠 In July 2020, France Football cancelled the Ballon d'Or due to pandemic disruptions. ⚖️ With Ligue 1 ending early while the Premier League, LaLiga, and Bundesliga resumed after delays, organisers argued comparing players across vastly different match counts wouldn't be fair. ❌ Champions League ties became single-leg knockouts behind closed doors, five substitutes were introduced, and Euro 2020 was postponed. 💭 Instead of a 2020 winner, France Football created a ‘Ballon d'Or Dream Team’ best XI. 🗳️ But at FourFourTwo, we held the vote anyway. We polled 101 football journalists across 101 nations and 6 continents to reveal who the true winner of the "Asterisk Ballon d'Or" really was. 🔢 Using the traditional Ballon d'Or voting system, each journalist chose their top 5 from our 30-man shortlist (awarding 6, 4, 3, 2, and 1 point[s]). 📣 The results? An absolute runaway victory... 🥇 Robert Lewandowski won FFT’s 2020 Ballon d'Or with 561 points. 👀 The 441-point gap to 2nd place (Kevin De Bruyne) would have broken the record for the biggest winning margin in history—beating Cristiano Ronaldo’s 429-point gap in 2016. ⤵️ Top 10 Results: 1️⃣ Lewandowski (561 pts) 2️⃣ De Bruyne (120 pts) 3️⃣ Mané (113 pts) 4️⃣ Messi (101 pts) 5️⃣ C. Ronaldo (98 pts) 6️⃣ Neuer (69 pts) 7️⃣ van Dijk (67 pts) 8️⃣ Mbappé (64 pts) 9️⃣ Kimmich (59 pts) 🔟 Neymar (48 pts) 11-30: 🇳🇴 Haaland (43 pts) 🇪🇬 Salah (42 pts) 🇩🇪 Müller (36 pts) 🇪🇸 Ramos (27 pts) 15=. 🇪🇸 Thiago (23 pts) 15=. 🇩🇪 Gnabry (23 pts) 🇮🇹 Immobile (21 pts) 🇰🇷 Son (18 pts) 🇨🇦 Davies (15 pts) 🇧🇪 Lukaku (14 pts) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Alexander-Arnold (13 pts) 🇫🇷 Benzema (11 pts) 🇵🇹 Fernandes (10 pts) 🇧🇷 Alisson (7 pts) 🇧🇷 Marquinhos (4 pts) 26=. 🇩🇪 Goretzka (3 pts) 26=. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Robertson (3 pts) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Kane (2 pts) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Henderson (1 pt) 🇦🇷 Di María (0 pts) 😮‍💨 Spare a thought for Ángel Di María—the only player on the 30-man shortlist to record nil points. 🤷‍♂️ Curiously, four journalists on our 101-man panel didn't give Lewandowski a single vote. Tough crowd... Petition to officially remove the 2020 asterisk, Your Honour! 📜 ✍️ See how each of the 101 journalists voted via the link below 📚 https://t.co/ZiqbRttaZ6

    1752115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202612x their median

    'On' has entered the football chat — and they’re bringing serious star power with them. 🇨🇭⚽️🇫🇷 🔛 Swiss sportswear giant @on_running has announced its entry into the beautiful game, via a high-powered project backed by game-changing elite talent: 🔥 Kylian Mbappé has ended his long-term relationship with Nike to become the face of the company's expansion into football boots, joining as a global ambassador, working directly with product teams to develop and test future footwear and apparel using On’s revolutionary LightSpray™ tech. 👑 Thierry Henry steps into the front office as Director of Football, having been secretly working behind the scenes with the brand since 2025 on its entry strategy and cultural approach. 💁‍♀️ Sydney Schertenleib, Swiss international and FC Barcelona star, expands her role with the brand to help shape products built specifically for the future of the women’s game. 🗣️ "Football doesn’t need another sportswear brand to do more of the same," says On Founder David Allemann. "We want to be the brand of the future." 👀 Adidas, Puma, New Balance and Skechers will all be watching with interest and quietly rueing a missed opportunity to sign Mbappe, who had been with Nike officially since the age of just nine and was never expected to part with the brand. 📈 On was founded in Switzerland in 2010 and has enjoyed a meteoric rise. Initially conceived as a running trainer, with a distinctive design on its base inspired by a garden hose, the company just further cemented itself as one of sportswear’s biggest names by securing Mbappe's signature.

    1633114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    🗓️📸 From the archive: Alex Ferguson wears a replica 1968 European Cup final top during training at the Nou Camp the night before the 1999 Champions League final vs Bayern Munich https://t.co/TGybG1S3H4

    1632013K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20269.0x their median

    🚨 NEW ISSUE: 24 hours with The Overlap 🎙️ 🌟 Exclusives with the Stick To Football crew 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Dalglish & Ferguson reflect on their careers 🤩 Barcelona's greatest-ever duo? 🇺🇸 Freddy Adu on his 'snowball' story 🥊 Footballers getting into boxing 🦘 Schwarzer answers your questions https://t.co/rUH19oZTuZ

    133117.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.5x their median

    A dismal Everton transfer window has shown the Friedkin Group's true colours https://t.co/Pdf946ayIY

    1240113K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 20268.0x their median

    😬 It's happening again 👇 Manchester City face second investigation into 114 Premier League charges after guilty verdict https://t.co/AUL6azAjZ9 https://t.co/9KjtywtLi1

    1123011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.0x their median

    🚨 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲 🚨 👔 Welcome to the 'Year of the Boss' 🤝 We meet the new faces in the dugouts 🍒 Bournemouth in Europe ⏪ Aguerooooo on THAT goal 🦁 Theo Paphitis on running Millwall 🎤 Chris Kamara's unbelievable career 🍻 Steve Coppell, Neal Maupay & Clarke Carlisle interviews 🇩🇰 Jan Molby's Perfect XI 👑 Kevin Keegan remembered ➕ MUCH MORE https://t.co/KXuHYalAnB

    1231013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 264 interactions, about 132x its own typical post.

What is FourFourTwo's engagement rate on X?
FourFourTwo (@FourFourTwo) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 480,362 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, FourFourTwo sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,985 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FourFourTwo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FourFourTwo post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going