Back to @FortniteStatus's profile

Fortnite Status engagement report

@FortniteStatus - 4.2M followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 4.2M followers
Per impression
0.607%
234K views on a typical post
Reach
5.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
68 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 234K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fortnite Status's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Fortnite Status sits above the 25th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 155,901 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,040 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 228 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 202614x their median

    Help Batman track down DC Sirens Catwoman, Harley Quinn, and Poison Ivy and send them back to Arkham for sizzling in-game rewards! https://t.co/o3oa6UYxNB

    17K1.6K4552671.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.7x their median

    <running Override_Adjustments.exe> ⬆️ Sprites can now be found in Chests. 🎮 Adjusted Aim Assist to restore behavior and feel to last season. 🟠 Added Overdrive Grenades to Vending Machines 🔫 Midas’ Masterpiece now temporarily drops from Dr. Eggman instead of in gold rifts. 🟡 Gold Sprites can now be found in Cheat Codes! 🔫🔫 Accuracy Buffs to Dual Pistols, pew pew! 🔵 Mega Buster damage and projectile speed increased.

    9.4K53086589751K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.7x their median

    📈 Duplicate Sprites now level up your collection! When you extract a Sprite you already have a copy of, it will give Sprite XP to the one in your collection. 👑 Once it's maxed, drop in and extract your Sprite to master it.

    7.2K44830785403K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.7x their median

    Woo-hoo! Springfield is now the only map in Reload's map rotation. Drop in and embrace chaos. 💥

    7.1K38349593551K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20265.3x their median

    Yesterday’s update included a bonus Starshadow Voidblade style for gifting or being gifted this season’s Battle Pass. We are granting the Starshadow style and accessories to all players who have previously gifted this season's Battle Pass and/or who own the Battle Pass, including active Fortnite Crew subscribers. This will be added to your Locker in the coming days.

    6.3K460575127586K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.1x their median

    The Shadow & Knuckles Bundle incorrectly included the Tails Tech Wrap, which is available in the Battle Pass. We've removed it and adjusted the bundle’s price. Anyone who received the Wrap through purchase of the bundle prior to this fix will keep the Wrap and we’ll be granting you the difference in V-Bucks back in the coming days.

    6.5K24437124535K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20265.0x their median

    ✨ We've decreased the Sprite Dust cost to resummon Sprites - especially for variants - so you can more easily run it back if one is lost!

    6.2K388355101561K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.7x their median

    We've updated the Sprite Locator gizmo! 🔎 It now has a MUCH higher chance of spawning a sprite variant, and a very low chance to spawn a base sprite. Alongside this buff, we'll be granting all players who'd used a gizmo since v41.20 three additional Sprite Locators. Happy sprite hunting!

    6.0K29740022431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.5x their median

    ❗️We're investigating an issue where the Ironmouse Sprite isn't being granted after players extract one from a match, as well as players may be running into empty Sprite Chests. We'll provide an update as soon as we have more info.

    5.0K3631.0K78610K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    With yesterdays’s game update, we've unlocked all ranked styles for older cosmetics like Felina and Vanguard Zadie where your past seasonal rank determined their availability! 🔓🏆

    4.7K276612112521K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 234K times each, and 0.607% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is Fortnite Status's engagement rate on X?
Fortnite Status (@FortniteStatus) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,179,000 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Fortnite Status sits above the 25th percentile of the 155,901 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FortniteStatus have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FortniteStatus post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going