PlayerSells
Back to @Footballogue's profile

Footballogue engagement report

@Footballogue - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 104 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
0.925%
61K views on a typical post
Reach
3.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
564
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.5/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 564 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 104 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 0.925% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 104 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 104 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Footballogue's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Footballogue sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link4% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+12%+10% to +15%6.3K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 300 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202657x their median

    🚨 OFFICIAL MESSI CARD IN FC 27 +3 UPGRADE 🤯🤯🤯🤯 https://t.co/eaz3TtvaZh

    31K7013013162.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202618x their median

    Eden Hazard est allé acheter des maillots de Chelsea pour ses enfants en mode 𝗜𝗡𝗖𝗢𝗚𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗢 ! 😭💙 Les vendeurs ne comprennent pas ce qui se passe 😭😭 "𝗘𝗦𝗧-𝗖𝗘 𝗤𝗨’𝗜𝗟 𝗬 𝗔 𝗨𝗡𝗘 𝗥𝗘́𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗣𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗟𝗘𝗦 𝗟𝗘́𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗦 ? 🤣🤣" (IG : hazardeden_10) https://t.co/dFtj2jGhPU

    9.4K44131421.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202617x their median

    This Araujo tackle on Cody Gakpo.🤕 https://t.co/aHO2A1rVLy

    9.1K1371161371.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202615x their median

    « 𝟭𝟴𝟬𝟬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗜𝗦𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗠𝗔𝗫𝗜𝗠𝗨𝗠, 𝗖̧𝗔 𝗙𝗔𝗜𝗧 𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗜 𝗗𝗘 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗜𝗥 𝗟’𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗤𝗨𝗜𝗧𝗘́ ? » La pique des supporters de Lens au PSG 🥶 (@VFeuillette75) https://t.co/cHNyXhwBaY

    7.9K55710059322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202614x their median

    😭 https://t.co/FsZTrO6N36

    7.3K497122104307K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202611x their median

    Prenons conscience tous ensemble de la légende du sport qu'est Léon Marchand, À SEULEMENT 24 ANS !!! 🤯 🇫🇷 Ce palmarès de dingue... Vivement les Jeux de 2028 ! (📸 @francetvsport) https://t.co/t3L8alZysr

    5.7K3642427285K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20268.6x their median

    𝗠𝗔𝗜𝗦 𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗘 𝗛𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘 😡😡😡 Un match de jeunes aux États-Unis a mal tourné après qu'un joueur a frappé à la tête son adversaire au sol. 😱 (@MattKerney) https://t.co/3GBdO1kczK

    4.5K21410458502K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.4x their median

    "T'es chaud on mange dehors ? Je t'invite" https://t.co/0TBqMq9uE5

    3.3K267211087K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.3x their median

    En février dernier,  Timothy Weah avait critiqué le prix des places pour assister à la Coupe du Monde. 🤑 Et juste avant la compétition, il a participé à une opération avec Zohran Mamdani, le maire de  New York, pour garantir 1 000 billets à 50 dollars l’unité (43 €) afin que des gens du coin puissent se rendre au MetLife Stadium, dans le New Jersey. BEAU GESTE ! 👏👏 (L’Equipe)

    3.3K2401315152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.4x their median

    🚨🚨 AYYOUB BOUADDI 🇲🇦 EST À UN PAS DE MANCHESTER CITY !!! 🩵 🗞️ @MatteMoretto https://t.co/WtWUueBg88

    2.8K1075525206K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 564 interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 104 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 61K times each, and 0.925% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 104 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 12% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Footballogue's engagement rate on X?
Footballogue (@Footballogue) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 104 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,935,721 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Footballogue sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Footballogue have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Footballogue post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going