Football Funnys engagement report
@FootballFunnys - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 193 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 193 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 193 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73K interactions, about 742x its own typical post.
Measured over 193 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Football Funnys's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Football Funnys sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 1% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 2026742x their median
That reply! 🤣 https://t.co/zCC2sQSP38
- Sep 5, 2026219x their median
From Uber driver to playing for Spurs... whata downgrade, feel sorry for the guy 😞 https://t.co/GsPxvQ74Fn
- Oct 13, 2026151x their median
Bruno couldn’t play with Pogba ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Sancho ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Eriksen ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Mount ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Rashford ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Martial ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Højlund ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Zirkzee ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Silva ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Fred ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Ugarte ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Matić ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with McTominay ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Amrabat ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Van de Beek ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Lingard ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Mata ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Pereira ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Baleba ❌ Bruno couldn’t play with Mainoo ❌ Different players have come and gone. Managers have been hired and sacked. Millions have been spent trying to fix Manchester United. Yet the same questions keep coming back. At what point do United supporters stop blaming everyone around Bruno Fernandes and start questioning whether he's part of the problem? 👀
- Oct 20, 2026145x their median
Liverpool's three main football grounds, all in one shot from above 🏟️ https://t.co/vnPBP1qdnC
- Aug 24, 2026142x their median
“Josh King shoots from the edge of the box” Robert Sanchez: https://t.co/Q25WfVUe6T
- Oct 16, 2026124x their median
A Liverpool fan caught Phil Thompson's attention and passed him a small container holding his late dad's ashes, asking if he'd scatter them on the Anfield pitch. He didn't hesitate. ❤️ Proper class. That's a moment the family will never forget. https://t.co/nzKZIRCeYU
- Aug 22, 2026118x their median
INSANE we are treated to this on Gameweek 1 of the new season 🤣 https://t.co/ZsFNZBtLQM
- Sep 7, 2026102x their median
Mikel Arteta celebrated Arsenal’s win against Chelsea with the referee. This is NOT normal. https://t.co/EgAszDREHn
- Sep 22, 202679x their median
Kounde arriving for France duty in style, as always… 😮💨🇫🇷 https://t.co/JITz92ckOQ
- Sep 23, 202676x their median
Scans reveal why Declan Rice was forced to pull out of the England squad, slight bruising but no broken bones 🥳 https://t.co/gdjkYhSdAU
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 101 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 193 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 9.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 193 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 73K interactions, about 742x its own typical post.
- What is Football Funnys's engagement rate on X?
- Football Funnys (@FootballFunnys) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 193 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,130,507 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Football Funnys sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FootballFunnys have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FootballFunnys post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 9.4 posts per day across the measured window.