Back to @FolagoR's profile

FOLAGOR engagement report

@FolagoR - 678K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.162%
of 678K followers
Per impression
2.05%
54K views on a typical post
Reach
7.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 678K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 2.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #xd.

Compared with accounts its own size

FOLAGOR's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.162%, FOLAGOR sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link46% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 46% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 112 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202651x their median

    Introducing @nopixel V Learn more about the next evolution of GTAV Roleplay, then tune in beginning on September 8 to watch the nopixel community kick off its latest adventures and earn up to GTA$1.5M and more with @Twitch Drops: https://t.co/8Ec4MAXSQn https://t.co/9PktZCWFeB

    51K2.7K1.6K59510M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202643x their median

    TE LA HACEN SIEMPRE https://t.co/YL9cezmEQ2

    44K3.4K1482722.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202612x their median

    Hostia que dura la carta de Leo a su padre. Todos somos mortales, puedes ser el puto rey del mundo que solo vas a tener un padre y una madre. Que mal.

    12K222110355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20269.2x their median

    He visto el sol sin gafas como 200 veces sin querer si cierro los ojos tengo una discoteca de luces xd

    9.9K11810312517K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.9x their median

    Gen 3 vs Gen 4 Pokémon art style comparison Valley Windworks https://t.co/dnPZJ9R6EP

    8.2K34766731.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20266.7x their median

    Estoy hasta la polla de que el 90% de los comentarios de mis vídeos son de gente diciendo que era cascada.

    7.0K1162035202K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.3x their median

    Me sorprende que este vídeo del que estoy hablando sin exagerar 25 minutos de las ventas de la Switch 2 y comparando y 'nosequé de Pokémon' haya gustado tanto, no solo en views (al final son leaks de la 10ª) si no en la retención de audiencia que es algo que no se contabiliza desde fuera pero es lo verdaderamente importante dentro de Youtube. Lo siento por mis turras en los vídeos, pero parece que os gustan. Mi canal principal es un cohete, pero el secundario creo que a veces os gusta hasta más.

    4.6K62702142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20264.2x their median

    El GTA VI se va a mostrar antes que el Zelda Ocarina Of Time Remake y ambos salen antes de que acabe el año. Nintendo lo ha vuelto a hacer.

    4.5K62283126K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.1x their median

    Me levanto y veo que me dicen que he ganado porque tengo un equipo con 2 potencias y rompecoraza y bla bla bla. Otro día más en la oficina, hoy os toca mamar a vosotros los que me quieren ver perder. Mi mejora como jugador de Lockes es clara, aún cometo errores, pero en combates me estoy convirtiendo en un jugador sólido. Desde Jim Carona llevo una racha de 8-3 en combates, lo podéis llamar suerte si queréis. Pero los mismos que están diciendo que el año pasado NO tenía mala suerte son los que ahora están diciendo que SI tengo. El Locke con Eric está en mi tejado, queda todavía una semana crítica pero lo quiero sacar adelante. Si gano a Eric, lo siguiente que se viene va a ser una prueba de fuego real. El rival que todo el mundo está esperando, el rival que tengo ganas de pisotear. Vaya momento estamos viviendo con los Lockes.

    4.3K9815419215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.1x their median

    El mejor Pokémon de la historia de los Lockes. 2-1 a ERIC. VAMOS JODER ESTOY FELIZ https://t.co/kRzcQwJDOS

    4.3K12210714154K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#xd

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 678K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 2.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

What is FOLAGOR's engagement rate on X?
FOLAGOR (@FolagoR) has an engagement rate of 0.162%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 678,453 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.162%, FOLAGOR sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FolagoR have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FolagoR post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going