Back to @FmrRepMTG's profile

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ engagement report

@FmrRepMTG - 5.5M followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.119%
of 5.5M followers
Per impression
1.70%
381K views on a typical post
Reach
6.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
224 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.87/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 6.5K interactions against 5.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 381K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 302K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.119%, Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.433%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Apr 23, 202246x their median

    Today and everyday is 1776. Never give up our freedoms. Never let the left steal them away. Be a watchman on the wall and stay on guard every single second of every single day because the left will stop at nothing until they destroy our faith, our families, and our freedoms.

    146K35K115K5.4KView on X
  • Aug 16, 202616x their median

    They are discussing using nuclear weapons on Iran in strategy meetings. Yes you read that correctly. Itโ€™s real. Iโ€™m not speculating, I know. And itโ€™s pure evil. The last time a nuclear weapon was used was August 6th and 9th of 1945 on two cities in Japan, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, immediately killing 110,000 people, vaporizing people at ground zero, and total deaths reached 214,000 by the end of the year from severe burns and trauma. But the extreme suffering continued for the Japanese people from radiation sickness, skyrocketing cancer rates, and generational birth defects. Not to mention wiping out all means of their economy. And the suffering was so great that all of humanity vowed, โ€œnever again.โ€ Trump and his admin were told by our own intelligence that Iran was no where near creating a nuclear weapon, then Israel said the same line itโ€™s repeated for decades, โ€œIran is only weeks away.โ€ So we bombed anyways, killed their leaders and innocent little children in a school, and Iran has controlled the Strait of Hormuz ever since and punished the region for their part in it. And now our government is the one actually discussing lowering the nuclear threshold in order to use nuclear weapons against Iran even though Trump claims heโ€™s won the war like 40 times and says the U.S. controls the SoH. Trump promised no more foreign wars, but may actually be the one who delivers a nuclear holocaust that would likely drag the entire world into major conflict, economic depression, and mass human suffering weโ€™ve never seen in our lifetimes and maybe throughout history. People need to speak out and boldly stop this insanity. America is not untouchable. If and when that happens, everyone, and I do mean everyone, will hold ALL of those in leadership right now fully responsible for the rest of human history. Do not use nuclear weapons and stop this war NOW.

    73K19K9.4K2.4K6.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202615x their median

    Unfortunately the Rule passed just now and no debate or vote was allowed on section 219, integration of US military technology and supply chains with Israelโ€™s. The NDAA will receive a recorded vote tomorrow with section 219 in it. Iโ€™ll vote no.

    77K14K3.0K1.4K4.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202613x their median

    What a slap in the face to American cattlemen & consumers. Worse than socialism! Dumping foreign beef in U.S. markets can temporarily lower prices but it wonโ€™t incentivize American farmers to raise more beef. Bring back Country Of Origin Labels & pass my PRIME Act. https://t.co/18Ml6NlRxB

    68K12K5.3K9912.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20266.2x their median

    Let me explain this absurd ruse: The Pentagon is pretending there have been two Iran wars separated by a brief cease-fire. The reality: By going more than 90 days without congressional authorization @SecWar IS BREAKING THE LAW and must be held accountable.

    60K13K1.6K2633.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20269.5x their median

    BREAKING: Iran has completely ruled out any future negotiations with the Trump administration, declaring it will wait out Donald Trump's term until January 20, 2029, per Iranian outlets and Ghalibaf advisor's post. "Trump will not reach an agreement with us. We will accompany him until his term ends," said Majid Shakeri, advisor to Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf. He posted: "The path to victory is neither fighting nor a deal โ€” it is managing the process of neither war nor peace, up to the point of victory. Publicly confirming negotiations with the U.S. is sheer folly. The winning approach is denial, ambiguity, and strategic patience." Iran's conditions remain unchanged: $300 billion in compensation, release of frozen assets, and withdrawal of U.S. forces. Until then, the Strait stays closed.

    49K8.9K1.7K2.4K9.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20268.0x their median

    Total betrayal. The House of Representatives passed the NDAA 216-212. 7 Republicans voted NO. 6 Democrats voted YES. This $1.1 trillion dollar military budget contains Sec 219 that ties our military intelligence and military industrial base to Israel. Now it goes to the Senate. https://t.co/kmFPOlJpBQ

    39K9.2K2.8K9532.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20257.1x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ TRUMP: โ€œWEโ€™LL BUY ARGENTINE BEEF.โ€ Reporters asked what heโ€™d say to U.S. ranchers losing their shirts. His answer? โ€œArgentina is fighting for its lifeโ€ฆ theyโ€™re dying.โ€ Meanwhile, 77 American cattle producers a day are going out of business. https://t.co/t0sKhFlQkv

    31K8.4K4.7K2.3K7.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20267.0x their median

    2 weeks before migrants from Morocco invaded Ceuta, the GOP passed a bill with $40 million for Morocco and a committee report advising: Spanish-administered cities of Ceuta and Melilla are located in Moroccan territory and remain the subject of Morocco's longstanding claim. https://t.co/chhpmUFtdX

    34K9.6K1.1K7792.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20266.3x their median

    ืื ื™ ื™ื•ืฆื ืขื›ืฉื™ื• ืœืคื’ื™ืฉื” ืขื ื™ื“ื™ื“ื ื• ื”ื ืฉื™ื ื“ื•ื ืœื“ ื˜ืจืืžืค - ื”ืคื’ื™ืฉื” ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื™ืช ืฉืœื ื• ืžืื– ืฉื ื‘ื—ืจ ืœื›ื”ื•ื ืชื• ื”ืฉื ื™ื™ื”, ื™ื•ืชืจ ืžื›ืœ ืžื ื”ื™ื’ ื‘ื™ื ืœืื•ืžื™ ืื—ืจ. ื–ื• ื–ื›ื•ืช ื’ื“ื•ืœื”, ื•ื–ื• ื’ื ืื—ืจื™ื•ืช ื’ื“ื•ืœื”. ื‘ืคื’ื™ืฉืชื ื• ื ื“ื•ืŸ ื‘ื›ืœ ื”ื ื•ืฉืื™ื ืฉืขืœ ื”ืคืจืง, ื•ื‘ืจืืฉื ืื™ืจืืŸ. ื”ืžื˜ืจื” ืฉืœื ื• ื‘ืจื•ืจื”: ืœืฉืžื•ืจ ืขืœ ื‘ื™ื˜ื—ื•ื ื” ืฉืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, ืœื—ื–ืง ืืช ืขื•ืฆืžืชื” ื•ืœื”ืจื—ื™ื‘ ืืช ืžืขื’ืœ ื”ืฉืœื•ื ืกื‘ื™ื‘ื ื•. ืื ื™ ื™ื•ืฆื ืœืฉืœื™ื—ื•ืช ื”ื–ืืช ืžืชื•ืš ืžื—ื•ื™ื‘ื•ืช ืขืžื•ืงื” ืœื”ื‘ื˜ื™ื— ืืช ื‘ื™ื˜ื—ื•ื ื”, ืขื•ืฆืžืชื” ื•ืขืชื™ื“ื” ืฉืœ ืžื“ื™ื ืช ื™ืฉืจืืœ. ื‘ืžื”ืœืš ื”ื‘ื™ืงื•ืจ ืื—ืœื•ืง ื’ื ื›ื‘ื•ื“ ืื—ืจื•ืŸ ืœื™ื“ื™ื“ ืืžืช ืฉืœื™ ื•ืฉืœ ืžื“ื™ื ืช ื™ืฉืจืืœ, ื”ืกื ืื˜ื•ืจ ืœื™ื ื“ื–ื™ ื’ืจื”ืื - ืžื’ื“ื•ืœื™ ื™ื“ื™ื“ื™ื” ืฉืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื‘ื›ืœ ื”ื–ืžื ื™ื. ืื ื™ ื‘ื˜ื•ื— ืฉื‘ื›ืš ืื ื™ ืžื™ื™ืฆื’ ืืช ืจื’ืฉื•ืชื™ื”ื ืฉืœ ืื–ืจื—ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื›ื•ืœื. ื‘ืขื–ืจืช ื”ืฉื, ื ืขืฉื” ื•ื ืฆืœื™ื—! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ

    30K3.9K6.8K6122.4M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6.5K interactions against 5.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.119%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 381K times each, and 1.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 302K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate on X?
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@FmrRepMTG) has an engagement rate of 0.119%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,459,670 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.119%, Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FmrRepMTG have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FmrRepMTG post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going