Back to @FlirtyRelation1's profile

could be us engagement report

@FlirtyRelation1 - 76K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.154%
of 76K followers
Per impression
2.25%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
6.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
93
interactions (median)
Saved
1.03%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 953 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

could be us's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.154%, could be us sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 77 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 21, 202410x their median

    Wanna see the other half? https://t.co/mbHitP8Wd0

    901381312.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20269.2x their median

    so fucking hot https://t.co/qvNvWs20IG

    766870216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.0x their median

    i love such raw videos https://t.co/oY7sRYaIH6

    347290012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.9x their median

    addicted to this video https://t.co/wgW8VwTHuK

    24427016.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.8x their median

    titties bouncing while getting fucked is greatest sight ever https://t.co/BJh1UqV5cp

    24016007.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.4x their median

    Slow hard sex then deep deep? Heaven really. So good to bury my dick in your pussy. I don't care anymore if this explodes inside me. https://t.co/XqZtbx5VV8

    209160011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.3x their median

    those pussy slaps are🤤🤤 https://t.co/KBmtFNApqV

    192170111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.1x their median

    the way he’s biting at her thighs too omgpls😵‍💫😵‍💫 https://t.co/YPhNYZFAj7

    17521035.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.9x their median

    Dating an innocent pretty boy who goes out of his way to be useful is definitely my goal https://t.co/anPS8ryo3e

    15819015.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.8x their median

    who wants this? https://t.co/kpVGHUv6pN

    15214016.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 76K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 953 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is could be us's engagement rate on X?
could be us (@FlirtyRelation1) has an engagement rate of 0.154%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 75,908 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.154%, could be us sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FlirtyRelation1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FlirtyRelation1 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going