Finn Harries engagement report
@FinnHarries - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.699% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 248K interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Finn Harries sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 5, 202561x their median
🚨 NEW: Netflix secretly recorded an interview with Dr. Jane Goodall in March, set to air only after her death. In it, she says she wishes Trump and Elon Musk could be blasted into space… and closes with: “Don’t lose hope.” Now that’s a final message. https://t.co/ywGysFqX6s
- May 4, 202447x their median
Always think about this with my little fluffy dog. My big dog does look like a wolf. https://t.co/jNyvlyplZB
- Feb 19, 202418x their median
127 children killed per-day in Auschwitz in 5 years. 139 children killed per day in Gaza in 135 days. Just like there can be no justification for the Holocaust, there can be no justification for the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people. Both deserve the same condemnation. https://t.co/3MhyoG4yH1
- Oct 7, 202411x their median
Removing the words “climate change” from Florida textbooks doesn’t seem to be working @FloridaGOP https://t.co/CsY5QgNT2V
- Dec 27, 2025270x their median
https://t.co/FQe5bCBqW1
- Aug 22, 20254.7x their median
THIS: https://t.co/QCsi9i1kji
- Dec 22, 20254.3x their median
https://t.co/fxHYR6S29D
- Jun 5, 20242.5x their median
My message to young people, civil society & other climate activists: You're on the right side of history. You speak for the majority. Keep it up. Don’t lose hope. It’s We the Peoples vs. the polluters and the profiteers. Together, we can win. https://t.co/8eFoRhHaDQ
- Aug 6, 20262.0x their median
people are dramatically underappreciating how much this discovery rewrites history > for decades, archaeologists believed the amazon could only support small, scattered communities because its soil was too poor for large, complex civilizations > then deforestation started exposing giant circles + squares carved into the ground, and the theory began falling apart > the intact jungle still hid the true scale, so researchers flew lidar over 4,500 km² and digitally peeled away the trees > they found 396 previously unknown earthworks, some surrounded by ditches 5m deep + connected by roads > across the full region, they estimate 20,000+ structures spread over an area roughly the size of syria > most belonged to a 2,500-year-old society researchers call the aquiry > its peak population is estimated at 1.25-3 million people (the city of rome had roughly 1 million) > so while rome ruled the mediterranean, this supposedly impossible forest society may have supported 1-3 romes worth of people > which raises the obvious question: how did a region archaeologists thought was infertile feed millions? > it turns out this part of the amazon has unusually fertile soil, and they grew maize + squash while actively managing the surrounding forest > then around 850-950 ad, their ceremonial centers were suddenly abandoned, and researchers still have no idea why > and all of this came from a territory covering less than 3% of the amazon what else is still hiding beneath the other 97% of the Amazon??
- Nov 10, 2025
The climate crisis affects every living being on this earth. We face a real need for greater global responsibility based on a sense of the oneness of humanity. If we fail to act, it is the children and grandchildren of today who will really suffer. For them we must act together.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.699% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 248K interactions, about 61x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Finn Harries's engagement rate on X?
- Finn Harries (@FinnHarries) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,385,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Finn Harries sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FinnHarries have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @FinnHarries post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.