Back to @FilmLadd's profile

FilmLadd engagement report

@FilmLadd - 89K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.138%
of 89K followers
Per impression
3.33%
3.7K views on a typical post
Reach
4.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0.109%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.6/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 3.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 344x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.

Compared with accounts its own size

FilmLadd's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.138%, FilmLadd sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 317 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 2026344x their median

    What everyone is overlooking about the Lindsay Clancy juror interviews. Is that multiple nurses acted as experts on medication in the jury room to convince 3/4 guilty voters to switch to not guilty. Jurors are expressly prohibited from acting as unvetted experts in deliberations

    38K3.2K33287685K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 2025218x their median

    We are going to find out that there are over 50 million illegals in the United States.

    34K3.1K971296859K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026182x their median

    Done. Next… https://t.co/ulT8Qw3ldU

    17K2.1K2.5K377171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202673x their median

    BREAKING: Iran's IRGC announces it struck the US destroyers USS Delbert D. Black (DDG-119) and USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53) with ballistic missiles in response to tonight's US strikes on Iranian oil tankers, saying both Aegis warships were carrying cruise missiles and that the attack "caused significant damage to these vessels."

    7.1K1.3K352167758K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202646x their median

    I blame myself for this whole debacle. Back in 2014, Milo reached out and begged me for a job, right as we were starting up Breitbart London. I made the mistake of giving him a chance. That’s where his entire life on the right began. His “Kernel Mag” (a tech blog in east London) had just gone tits up, but he had a flair for the acerbic and for noticing. Also, I was desperate for columnists. But within WEEKS, he was emailing the U.S. bosses demanding MY job, and claiming he could do it better. He was rebuffed, of course. I remember one email he got from Bannon calling him “marginalia” and saying he wishes he could edit like me. Bannon forwarded it on to me for a chuckle. He could be cruel like that. But I enjoyed the banter. Milo went on to insert himself in every room and relationship in the company until he finally got what he wanted: his own staff and his own “Tech” vertical on the site. As a senior editor, however, I could see what this was really all about. He wasn’t writing his own columns. He had staff draft them and leave “[INSERT MILOISM]” prompts for him to come in and top and tail the articles. I could see it all live in the site’s back end. Then came the money, as Rebekah Mercer and others shelled out MILLIONS to tour him around the U.S. as some kind of conservative firebrand, which I knew he wasn’t. I felt so ashamed of everything to do with him that when the story about his excuses for priestly pederasty finally got aired in 2017, I was the first to tell the company bosses: he has to go. And so he went, and I hoped that would be the last of him. But once again he minced into the arms of the unsuspecting: first Laura Loomer, then Marjorie Taylor Greene, and finally, Kanye West. Some time last year he began tweeting about me again, making all kinds of lurid and false accusations, just months after he had dined at my DC restaurant Butterworth’s, and lauded its beauty on his X account. But as he was needlessly abusing me again, his own fate was being sealed. A friend at the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) reached out and let me know: “Milo has been living in the US illegally.” I was shocked, though I suppose I ought not to have been. A source at the State Department confirmed it, when I enquired, and so began his deportation saga. For those who haven’t followed along: it appears that not only was he publicly lying about his immigration status in the United States, but that he even missed court proceedings on the matter. Finally, I got word last month, that he was about to be deported. On Thursday night, I got a call. As overly dramatic as it may seem. “We got him. In Louisiana.” And yet, of course, he’s certain to resurface in Britain shortly. Perhaps as an advisor to Rupert Lowe, or perhaps as a contestant on some third tier reality TV show. So in advance I say to Britain: my apologies. For all of it.

    4.4K67934792283K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202643x their median

    Milo is one guy you really don’t want to cross. It may take some time, but when he’s free, he’s going to go full scorched earth. This was an incredibly bad move.

    4.1K29078669103K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 202618x their median

    Thrilled to be included. Obviously, my manuscript is already late. So that’ll be all for now. In the meantime, @rustyrockets How to Become a Christian in 7 Days ships April 20 https://t.co/sCBXZ6bcWF Thank you @TuckerCarlson @TCNetwork https://t.co/LY54luk5R3

    2.5K37330619935K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202623x their median

    Trump drops Presidential rankings chart: https://t.co/ag8FiSDP6B

    1.1K1149645771.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202622x their median

    🚨 #BREAKING President Trump just announced that his administration is moving to allow farmers the ability process their own meat. This is huge for farmers, the economy, and for rural Americans who should be able to get meat from their neighbors. Long overdue, but these are the decisions we were hoping to see.

    2.2K3521677173K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202614x their median

    🚨Just in: Tucker Carlson calls for President Trump to be removed from office immediately https://t.co/9crLeSPCME

    98110853790420K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 3.33% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 344x its own typical post.

What is FilmLadd's engagement rate on X?
FilmLadd (@FilmLadd) has an engagement rate of 0.138%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,301 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.138%, FilmLadd sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FilmLadd have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FilmLadd post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going