Fernando Holiday engagement report
@FernandoHoliday - 544K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 544K followers, an engagement rate of 0.557%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #cnnagora.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fernando Holiday's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.557%, Fernando Holiday sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 46% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 237 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 17, 202624x their median
Paulo Gonet, Procurador-Geral da República, tem reputação ilibada e vida pública de lisura insuspeita. Isso nunca foi objeto de disputa: é reconhecido em todos os espectros, por quem concorda e por quem discorda dele. Mesmo assim, teve a honra injustamente manchada pelo levantamento do sigilo de conversas que nada de ilícito retratavam. E, naquele exato momento, o estrago à reputação já estava feito. Ninguém desfaz manchete com reparo tardio em plenário. Ainda assim, assistimos na terça-feira a uma cena lamentável. Em plenário, o próprio relator reconheceu, em alto e bom som, a lisura da conduta de Gonet e admitiu que nada havia contra ele. Nada. Então por que expor? Quem atesta a honra de alguém só depois de tê-la arrastado pela praça pública não está corrigindo um erro: está confessando que ele era evitável. E não foi só isso. A intenção de lucrar politicamente com o episódio ficou escancarada quando o relator fez publicar vídeo nas redes sociais agradecendo o apoio popular. Apoio a quê, exatamente? A um ato que ele mesmo admitiu não ter fundamento contra a pessoa exposta? Quem age assim não é magistrado imparcial: é boneco de campanha, um pixuleco eleitoral. Já vimos esse filme. Na Lava Jato, Deltan Dallagnol e Sergio Moro transformaram vazamento seletivo em método. A ideia era sempre criar o fato consumado antes da ação penal, colher os dividendos políticos e deixar a defesa correndo atrás de um julgamento que a opinião pública já havia feito. Linchamento coletivo serve para esvaziar o direito de defesa e enterrar a presunção de inocência. E, como na Lava Jato, a hora nunca é ao acaso. Lá, sigilos caíam a poucas semanas das eleições. Aqui, o levantamento apareceu às vésperas do 7 de Setembro, para inflar as ruas, arrancar dividendos políticos, sujar reputações e intimidar quem se opõe a esse método. No fundo, o alvo é o direito de defesa de pessoas contra as quais esses agentes nutrem algo que se parece muito mais com vingança do que com justiça. Instituição séria respeita o devido processo desde o primeiro ato. A Paulo Gonet, minha integral solidariedade. O Brasil e as instituições são devedores da coragem, da seriedade e da correção de homens como ele.
- Oct 14, 20267.9x their median
Assim será o governo Flávio na cabeça do esquerdista! https://t.co/Zi515Bva2c
- Aug 28, 20266.7x their median
🚨ATENÇÃO: Flávio aciona TSE e pede que Lula seja proibido de usar o Palácio da Alvorada em campanha, como ocorreu com Bolsonaro em 2022 https://t.co/AwbW2PQUuh
- Aug 26, 20265.4x their median
Janja lançou o Comitê dos Crentes no PT, mas não se esqueçam que no Carnaval do Rio, estavam lá curtindo da cara dos evangélicos com as famílias in conserva. https://t.co/aXBHfz5wjm
- Sep 1, 20264.8x their median
🚨MORAES SE DESESPERA E TENTA AGREDIR ANDRÉ MENDONÇA! As coisas saíram de controle. Moraes foi pego de surpresa e não esperava que o Ministro André Mendonça continuasse com as investigações. Por isso, o projeto de ditador partiu para cima de Mendonça, segundo o Metropoles. Até aqui descobrimos que Moraes editou contrato milionário da esposa, sabia do plano de fuga de Vorcaro, recebeu pedido para protegê-lo e teve cartão de crédito liberado para os filhos. Em breve o plenário do STF terá que julgar a abertura de investigação contra o ditador. Ao lado de Mendonça devem ficar Fux e Nunes Marques. Gilmar, Zanin e Dino com Alexandre. Toffolli impedido. Fachin e Carmen Lucia como fiéis da balança.
- Aug 13, 20264.7x their median
O Missão, partido do MBL, cometeu o crime mais burro da história da Justiça Eleitoral e foi pego com a boca na botija. 🤦🏾♂️ Somente um representante do Missão poderia ter adicionado a filiação de Flávio ao sistema do TSE. https://t.co/J0TMzYxIZT
- Sep 3, 20264.2x their median
🚨 URGENTE Alexandre de Moraes inclui André Mendonça no inquérito das Fake News e pede que seja investigado por improbidade e abuso de autoridade. Definitivamente, Moraes está fora de si. Precisa ser interditado imediatamente!
- Aug 29, 20263.9x their median
Isso aqui é uma obra de arte 😂 https://t.co/MKcD1CSc4f
- Sep 17, 20262.9x their median
BASTA! ACABOU A PACIÊNCIA! Parabéns ao @ThomazSJC! Em SP: Thomaz Henrique para deputado estadual 22111 Lucas Pavanato para deputado federal 2211 💪🏾🇧🇷 https://t.co/VVJw7WQFiS
- Sep 16, 20262.8x their median
O basta de André Mendonça para Gilmar Mendes é forte porque não é uma voz solitária que clama no deserto. É a nossa voz. A voz povo.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 544K followers, an engagement rate of 0.557%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
- What is Fernando Holiday's engagement rate on X?
- Fernando Holiday (@FernandoHoliday) has an engagement rate of 0.557%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 543,859 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.557%, Fernando Holiday sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FernandoHoliday have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FernandoHoliday post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.