Back to @Fenereditor's profile

Fener Editör engagement report

@Fenereditor - 305K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.076%
of 305K followers
Per impression
1.29%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
5.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
232
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 232 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #fenerinmaçıvar.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fener Editör's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.076%, Fener Editör sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202640x their median

    Kaya Çilingiroğlu: Umut Bozok diye bir çocuk girdi oyuna... Bir kart gördü asla ve asla görmemesi lazım bir oyuncunun. Ondan evvel bir şut attı kaleye, o şutu atan adamın zekasından şüphe duyarım. Bir de eski twitleri çıktı ortaya "ölümüne Galatasaray vs.." 📰 @SportsDigitale https://t.co/GyMcfxjrCr

    8.1K9757017404K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202621x their median

    Metin Öztürk: "Belli ki bu sene zor geçecek. Belli ki Galatasaray'ın şampiyonluğu engellenmeye çalışılacak." Reha Kapsal: "Metin Bey, son 4 yılın şampiyonu sizsiniz. Şu anda da lidersiniz. Geçen hafta Osimhen'in pozisyonu penaltı değildi, VAR devreye girince penaltı verildi. Adaletten bahsediyorsunuz, bunu da söylesenize."

    4.3K4361051397K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202612x their median

    Şöyle bir teknik direktörümüz olsa insan içine çıkamayız! https://t.co/FCnsE4YcOS

    2.3K19424433154K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    Gol: Osimhen Asist: Eski Gsli Emin Bayram https://t.co/2veuJ1RTgx

    2.3K206411237K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.2x their median

    Göztepe maçından sonra bu maçta da Yunus'a olmayan bir faul sonrası gelen Galatasaray golleri!!!! Bu kadar kul hakkı da fazla artık!

    1.3K10327324K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.8x their median

    Ulaş Özdemir: "Ferhat Gündoğdu MHK’sinin kurduğu yapıyı geçen yıl gitseydi 5 yılda şimdi 10 yılda temizleyemeyeceğiz! Öyle bir yapı kurdu ki ülke futbolunun marka değerini her maç yerlere seriyor." https://t.co/A51JxPuEy1

    9861228314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.8x their median

    "Anthony Taylor, haftalık online eğitimde Galatasaray - Göztepe maçındaki Osimhen’in pozisyonundaki VAR müdahalesini ve penaltı kararını hatalı buldu." 📰 Umut Eken https://t.co/99C6XTpDem

    941105501038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.7x their median

    Sallai'nin son anda yaptığı müdahaleye bakın! Rakibinin ayağının kırılmaması çok büyük şans. Net Kırmızı kart! https://t.co/5fHOUtWilG

    92313524935K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.6x their median

    Reha Kapsal: Metin Bey, zaten son 4 yıldır siz şampiyon oluyorsunuz. Bunda herhangi bir şey yok, yine 10 puanla lidersiniz. Geçen hafta Osimhen'e hakem penaltıyı vermedi, VAR çağırdı verdi. O zaman onu söylemiyorsunuz, şimdi adalet arıyorsunuz. https://t.co/f13pI0mSBi

    7547811135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.7x their median

    🗣️Ahmet Dursun: Fenerbahçe ve Beşiktaş’a gelince çalışmayan VAR Galatasaray’a gelince çok güzel çalışıyor. https://t.co/7QkL5GwF0K

    53046376159K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fenerinmaçıvar

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 232 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.076%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is Fener Editör's engagement rate on X?
Fener Editör (@Fenereditor) has an engagement rate of 0.076%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 304,857 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.076%, Fener Editör sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fenereditor have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fenereditor post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going