Back to @FeminizingBetas's profile

Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+ engagement report

@FeminizingBetas - 727K followers on X

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.04%
of 727K followers
Per impression
5.56%
134K views on a typical post
Reach
18.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.56%
2.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.73/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 727K followers, an engagement rate of 1.04%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 5.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 77% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+'s engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.04%, Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 20263.3x their median

    Your ex told you to 'go fuck yourself' so you listened. https://t.co/oBsmLUC6V7

    22K2.2K9135376K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    Turns out getting a fat ass and growing your titties was all you had to do to fix your non-existent sex life ^^ https://t.co/8YDghttuPk

    21K2.0K4110368K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.9x their median

    After a dick like his, your hole won't even close anymore 😈 https://t.co/eYbmuTFtE1

    19K2.1K7935428K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    The gas station worker recognized you from your secret Twitter account. You decided to give him a quick taste of your hole for a discount! https://t.co/jP5r1Ich9c

    19K2.0K3310288K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.8x their median

    You're wearing a cow outfit, your titties are lactating and your clitty is leaking while you take it in the ass. And you used to think you were a dude... https://t.co/zvlgKFAYmA

    19K1.8K3110262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    You don't care who it is, you just want their dick to bounce on. The hormones really turned you into a permanently horny mess. https://t.co/MneMipLUmu

    18K1.8K6441370K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    When you run out of lubricant but you're still horny... https://t.co/rqxt67QuQP

    18K1.6K5614297K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.5x their median

    Ever since you started glutes workout, your homies seem to hand around you more 😈 https://t.co/QQmMe6glX0

    17K1.7K467254K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.5x their median

    He folded you like a precel and now his cock is making your prostate pulsate with waves of pleasure. You are addicted to being a little slut for hung men 💗 https://t.co/qSGx2T0Cjq

    16K2.0K3617286K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.5x their median

    Chastity will make you so horny that you won't be able to wait till you get home! https://t.co/Kijr0qxMnp

    17K1.7K4111250K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7.4K interactions against 727K followers, an engagement rate of 1.04%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 134K times each, and 5.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 77% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+'s engagement rate on X?
Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+ (@FeminizingBetas) has an engagement rate of 1.04%, based on the median interactions across 64 original posts from the last 30 days against 726,512 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.04%, Feminizing βetas💄0.7M+ sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FeminizingBetas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FeminizingBetas post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going