FELIX engagement report
@FellMentKE - 270K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 338 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.125%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 87K times each, and 0.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #claude, #convergeai, #enterpro.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #claude, #convergeai, #enterpro.
Compared with accounts its own size
FELIX's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.125%, FELIX sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 79% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 29% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 517 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 7, 20265.7x their median
Remote jobs for introverts (no talking required)!!! You can do in the evening from home after your 9-5 job, and it pays in USD. Open Thread ↓
- Aug 26, 20263.8x their median
CANCELLED LINKEDIN. CANCELLED UPWORK. CANCELLED HOW PEOPLE USUALLY FIND REMOTE JOBS. People are quietly landing remote jobs without applying all day. Here are 12 sites they don’t talk about:
- Sep 4, 20263.5x their median
CANCELLED LINKEDIN. CANCELLED UPWORK. CANCELLED HOW PEOPLE USUALLY FIND REMOTE JOBS. People are quietly landing remote jobs without applying all day. Here are 12 sites no one talks about: 👇
- Sep 3, 20263.4x their median
If you’re looking for a remote job, never search on: LinkedIn Indeed Glassdoor Instead search on: 👇
- Aug 31, 20262.7x their median
R.I.P. LinkedIn R.I.P. Upwork R.I.P. Indeed I spent 5 years applying. 1 interview. My wife spent 3 hours on these 10 sites. 5 job offers instantly. Use these 10 platforms to find remote jobs that actually want to hire you:
- Apr 10, 20261.9x their median
Hailuo AI’s AnyAngle is perfect for storyboarding. It gives you extreme control over all camera angles. I used it in a short clip, check out the comparison. It instantly turned an ordinary scene into something cinematic. https://t.co/GyGT9e5ErD
- Sep 3, 2026
Gaming then: 6 hours straight after school, zero responsibilities, fighting your siblings for the living room TV. Gaming now: 30 minutes in bed, on the couch, or at a hotel, trying to unwind without hijacking the main screen. Seeing GamingThenVsNow shows how we didn’t stop playing as we grew up, as our gaming moments just got smaller. But why are we still settling for tiny handheld displays? #GamingThenVsNow
- Aug 26, 2026
The most useful AI avatar tools are not just about making a face talk. They can help creators and teams build a consistent on-camera presence that can be reused whenever they need a new message. That is what stood out to me when testing Wizstar AI Avatar. With @WizstarAI Avatar Turbo, you can turn a single photo into a talking avatar video by adding a script and voice. Wizstar also offers AI Avatar options for longer videos and more customized avatar workflows. It’s an interesting option for creators, marketing teams, product updates, tutorials, and training content where filming every version from scratch takes time. Wizstar recently hit #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt. Try it here: https://t.co/9PFJVzrvd5 #Wizstar #ProductHunt #DigitalTwin #AIVideo
- Sep 3, 2026
The most interesting part of this launch is not simply that a model is open sourced. Ant Ling released Ling-3.0-flash-Fin beside FinFIRST, an open benchmark for financial search agents. Building and evaluating in public is a stronger combination. Here is why 👇 https://t.co/5OSZ1EuRfR
- Aug 31, 2026
AI video in just a few seconds feels different. MiniMax H3 Max on MiniMax Design — post-trained by fal — is faster than Twitch's live stream. And far cheaper to iterate on. Less waiting. More creating. https://t.co/TzlIjtLKL0
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 338 interactions against 270K followers, an engagement rate of 0.125%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 87K times each, and 0.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #claude, #convergeai, #enterpro.
- What is FELIX's engagement rate on X?
- FELIX (@FellMentKE) has an engagement rate of 0.125%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 270,295 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.125%, FELIX sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FellMentKE have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FellMentKE post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.