Back to @FedicaHQ's profile

Fedica engagement report

@FedicaHQ - 357K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 357K followers
Per impression
0.024%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.024% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fedica's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Fedica sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link73% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 73% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 13, 202619x their median

    Fedica 2.0 gives you scheduling, analytics, research & analysis in one suite: 🔥measure multi-platform analytics 🔥two-click custom crossposts 🔥smoother team workflows 🔥competitive research across X/Bluesky/Mastodon 🔥Communities scheduling, dark mode & more. https://t.co/tCC9qwLieB

    1324020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20269.0x their median

    It's okay to not know what to put on your X feed. https://t.co/HGjvfgwKrU

    80106.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.0x their median

    Vampire Machine Bigrade has been unleashed! https://t.co/qClafldako

    40011.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.0x their median

    Here's the metrics other's wish they had when measuring ROI for their clients👇 Eg: Seeing the people and their demographic stats from your best performing content. https://t.co/HJYUMatuS5

    11105.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    G'day Australia, don't be an egg n schedule ya posts in the wee hours for ya fans in America. Schedule n automate ya content at the best time for ya fans in Canada and the US of A. https://t.co/d3C6MhI8aB

    10204.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.0x their median

    There's a missed opportunity when you see your audience as one group of the same people. If you filter them, you can discover new pockets of personas you can target with content or an offer catered to that kind of person from their occupations + more! 👉 https://t.co/cfZZ7y5PHA https://t.co/FyMOVwwv7u

    11003.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    Are X Communities really shutting down? We asked Gemini, ChatGPT and Claude and their answers were starkly different! https://t.co/xct8bAavT8

    01103.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.0x their median

    Social Media fact: Lists are your secret weapon! 🚀 Easily create lists from analytics, audience grouping, or even by studying someone else's followers. The benefits? ✔ Interactive map ✔ Language and timezones ✔ Maximum reach ✔ Top influencers https://t.co/hEvpr1gke0

    10102.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.0x their median

    Tips to secure leads by getting to the core of people's hesitations before they come up. 3 reasons why your buyers hesitate: - You don’t follow up - You talk more than you listen - You imply someone isn’t worth your time https://t.co/X2FwvKZTRK

    01104.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.0x their median

    Schedule your reposts and quote-posts at the right time. Also, share any site to your content calendar. All this is possible in Fedica's free browser extension for #Chrome, #Firefox, and now #MSedge. https://t.co/GYTfnVp7Ue

    10103.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.024% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Fedica's engagement rate on X?
Fedica (@FedicaHQ) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 357,404 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Fedica sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FedicaHQ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FedicaHQ post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going