Back to @FauxPelini's profile

Faux Pelini engagement report

@FauxPelini - 539K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 539K followers
Per impression
1.16%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
216
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 216 interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 183K interactions, about 2655x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Faux Pelini's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Faux Pelini sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video5% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 42 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 8, 20262655x their median

    Purposefully turning off the halftime show Let’s rally together and show big corporations they can’t just do whatever they want without consequences (which equals viewership for them) You are their benefit. Realize you have power. Turn off this halftime. A fake American citizen performing who publicly hates America. I cannot support that.

    121K9.4K41K12K78M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026142x their median

    the clock on your tv screen isn’t the official game clock the official clock is this other special one I have in a drawer over there you can’t see it right now though stop complaining

    29K1.2K10338457K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 2026109x their median

    Trump: I just had this done. *holds up chart comparing reflecting pool to buildings* https://t.co/9T15bn6VxA

    15K1.1K2.4K1.4K8.9M viewsView on X
  • Jan 10, 2026200x their median

    If not for Indiana’s pick six and 4 other touchdowns Oregon is dominating

    13K250389236K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 202649x their median

    Iran-New Zealand was a tie does this mean NZ has to give them 300 billion dollars

    8.3K6398225397K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 202643x their median

    A message to the Texas Tech community from our leadership. https://t.co/MpbXtNJakp

    3.0K3263.1K1.5K6.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202637x their median

    Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump is Accelerating Medical Treatments for Serious Mental Illness https://t.co/E42peiF8I8

    4.3K7811.4K3995.9M viewsView on X
  • Apr 22, 202636x their median

    Salmon exposed to cocaine in the water swim longer distances than those that go without, according to a study released this week. https://t.co/wneV9NpMyg

    3.1K4141.7K1.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Jan 14, 202681x their median

    The best to ever do it. Congratulations to @NdamukongSuh on being a 2026 inductee into the College Football Hall of Fame! #GBR | @NFFNetwork https://t.co/XmAsdVXTTB

    5.0K4643350280K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202619x their median

    I’m all for kids getting paid but how is Bo Jackson still eligible

    4.1K4481113K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 216 interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 183K interactions, about 2655x its own typical post.

What is Faux Pelini's engagement rate on X?
Faux Pelini (@FauxPelini) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 539,125 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Faux Pelini sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FauxPelini have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FauxPelini post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going