Back to @FastXNetwork's profile

FastX Network engagement report

@FastXNetwork - 198K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 198K followers
Per impression
0.239%
66K views on a typical post
Reach
33.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
159
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 159 interactions against 198K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 2.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fastxnetwork, #fxnw, #listing.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #fastxnetwork, #fxnw, #listing.

Compared with accounts its own size

FastX Network's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, FastX Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 13, 20252.1x their median

    FastX Network has closed $3 Million investment round lead by @ibcgroupio @RoundtableSpace, @castrumistanbul @tbvxyz, @alphacapital_vc, @Gemhead_Capital. FastX develops powerful Al infrastructure that transforms decentralized prediction markets into an intuitive experience. https://t.co/WokgRbmULa

    165201412239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    The earlier you started mining, the more rewards you will receive. FastX Network has updated its official website with a newly designed User Interface. #FastXNetwork #FXNW https://t.co/3rYjny8n2q

    1123338070K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    AI is scaling fast β€” and the infrastructure race is getting real. 🌍⚑ AI is scaling fast β€” and so is the infrastructure race. 🌍⚑ Data-center power demand could nearly double by 2030. The big question: how do we power and scale the infrastructure behind AI? #FastXNetwork #AI https://t.co/7TEhTH87nF

    1043732058K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί Europe is scaling up AI compute. A new €388M AI supercomputer is on the way That’s exactly where @FastXNetwork comes in: expanding access to GPU compute for the next generation of AI. Via@thenextweb https://t.co/RGSkLY572n #FastX #AI #GPU

    1083332087K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    πŸš€ GPUs are moving far beyond AI training. AWS is seeing GPU-powered workloads scale across AI agents, enterprise automation, scientific discovery & robotics. GPU compute is becoming core infrastructure for the AI economy β€” and FastX Network is building for that future. ⚑ https://t.co/v80ZR3GQNm

    1083331093K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    AI computing power is becoming the key productivity resource for organization success and global economic development. Join FastX Nodes to catch the ride for the new fortune. πŸš€ Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) is launching AI computing futures. https://t.co/Env92XwvRE

    615456054K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    A Node is not just a piece of hardware. In the current market, it is the chance to catch the ride to the next wave of economic boom. #FXNW #FastXNetwork https://t.co/in8L6h2AhU

    1033725066K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    πŸš€ FastX Network is excited to announce our partnership with @KaratDao! Together, we’re connecting AI infrastructure and Web3 innovation to explore new opportunities, expand our ecosystems, and create more value for our communities. 🀝 More to come! ⚑ #FastX #KaratDAO #AI https://t.co/OwwIiBBHN8

    993724085K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    We are about to upgrade our website and server at UTC 12pm today on Sept 21, 2026. Our node mining maintenance fee will be open for deposit at UTC 0am on Sept 22, 2026. The 1st round FXNW reward will be issued on UTC 0am on Sept 23, 2026. Please deposit at least 1 hour ahead. πŸ”₯ https://t.co/EMeJDV8VPk

    993921068K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    πŸš€ GPU-as-a-Service is taking off. The market is projected to grow from $8.66B in 2026 to $162.54B by 2034 β€” a 44.3% CAGR. FastX Network is building for this future β€” making GPU compute more accessible for the growing AI economy. ⚑ https://t.co/UNq0tZVE8G #FastXNetwork #GPU

    963527084K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fastxnetwork#fxnw#listing#ai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 159 interactions against 198K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 33.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 2.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fastxnetwork, #fxnw, #listing.

What is FastX Network's engagement rate on X?
FastX Network (@FastXNetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 198,017 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, FastX Network sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FastXNetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FastXNetwork post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going