Back to @Fanatical's profile

Fanatical engagement report

@Fanatical - 389K followers on X

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 389K followers
Per impression
0.14%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.29%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 72% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 705 interactions, about 101x its own typical post.

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fanatical's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Fanatical sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,349 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,452 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 331 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 2026101x their median

    It's safe to say that Silent Hill is back. We've gone from twelve years without a new title to having three excellent ones in as many years, with a fourth on the way. The excellent Silent Hill 2 Remake demonstrated just how beautiful this franchise can look on modern hardware, whilst Silent Hill f and the recently released Townfall have shown us there is scope for incredible new stories to be told in this universe. With the first game receiving a remake next year, it's a really exciting time to be a Silent Hill fan.

    6205723522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202642x their median

    Win a Steam Deck! πŸ‰ To celebrate the imminent release of Dragon's Dogma II: Dark Arisen, we're giving you the chance to win a Steam Deck simply by wishlisting the game! You could also win a copy of the game or a Fanatical voucher! Simply wishlist the game and sync your Steam account with Fanatical to enter! πŸ”½

    2244619221K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.7x their median

    Capcom are on an absolutely generational run right now. In 2026 alone, they've delivered us Resident Evil Requiem, Monster Hunter Stories 3: Twisted Reflection, PRAGMATA, and Onimusha: Way of the Sword. A run like that isn't normal; it's downright incredible. In an age where some studios will labour for over a decade to deliver a gaming masterpiece, delivering four in a year feels like an impossibility. And yet, here we are, beholding Capcom having done just that. What an amazing achievement. All hail Capcom, they're on top of the world right now.

    475118.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20267.0x their median

    ICYMI... You could win a Steam Deck simply by wishlisting Dragon's Dogma II: Dark Arisen on Steam! 🐲 All you have to do is wishlist the game and sync your Steam account with Fanatical to enter! πŸ”½ https://t.co/yCD0TYWIrI

    4252011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.7x their median

    Woke up thinking about The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind. https://t.co/WOr5fZZkyq

    4142011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.7x their median

    Woke up thinking about Dishonored. https://t.co/FyVjgT3pVc

    390109.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20265.0x their median

    ICYMI... 🐰 You could win a bundle of gadgets simply by wishlisting The Rabbit Haul on Steam! πŸ“± The Rabbit Haul drops on the 21st of September and promises a charming gameplay experience. Build up your farm and defend it from monsters when night falls in this cartoony, 2.5D farming sim! Wishlist now to enter our competition! πŸ”½

    265407.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.7x their median

    Paging Agent 47 fans, it's time to celebrate the most lethal man alive. Never before has a barcode struck such fear into the hearts of humanity. Your heart would skip a beat if you saw it in the wild, and for good reason. Armed with silenced silverballers, or even just a blueberry muffin, Agent 47 holds a strong claim for being the scariest man on Earth. Do not, whatever you do, do anything that might annoy his bosses, because if he comes for you? Hoo boy, it's not lookin' good for ya! But, as we've seen in Absolution, having this man on your side is a cheat code. We should all aspire to have as much aura as this man.

    2841010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.6x their median

    COMPLETE YOUR RESIDENT EVIL COLLECTION 🧟 Just in time for Zach Cregger's "Resident Evil" movie dropping today, you can grab 11 Resident Evil games from our Capcom Mega Bundle! For as low as $6.20 each, you can get the following games! πŸ₯‡ Resident Evil Village Gold Edition ❗ Resident Evil 2 Remake ❗ Resident Evil 3 Remake 🀝 Resident Evil Revelations 1&2 Double Pack 🀝 Resident Evil 4 (2005) & Resident Evil 5 Gold Edition Double Pack 🀝 Resident Evil 6 Complete & Resident Evil 7 Biohazard Double Pack 🀝 Resident Evil HD Remaster & Resident Evil 0 Double Pack Grab up to 8 games and complete your Resident Evil Collection today! πŸ”½

    2381010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.0x their median

    Discover nine excellent games from the Brazilian publisher Nuntius! πŸ‡§πŸ‡· Take to the foosball pitch in Pimbolas, escape an unrelenting monster in Damned 2, blast away extraterrestrial invaders in Alien Strike, and much more! Grab all 9 games for just $7.99! πŸ”½ https://t.co/HmOORKVx71

    194239.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 72% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 705 interactions, about 101x its own typical post.

What is Fanatical's engagement rate on X?
Fanatical (@Fanatical) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 87 original posts from the last 30 days against 388,702 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Fanatical sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,349 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fanatical have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fanatical post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going