Back to @Fameye's profile

PETER engagement report

@Fameye - 347K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.415%
of 347K followers
Per impression
8.30%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
5.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.415%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 8.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #yfmghana, #pizzamangenzpack, #pizzamanxfameye.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #yfmghana, #pizzamangenzpack, #pizzamanxfameye.

Compared with accounts its own size

PETER's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.415%, PETER sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,672 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.673%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,672 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 199 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20267.2x their median

    God is trending 🔥💡⚓️ https://t.co/x0FHiSQAy9

    9.8K40853474K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20265.0x their median

    You know what?🎺 https://t.co/DtI1prMPer

    6.6K461421354K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.5x their median

    KSS IS GEN Z, GEN Z IS KSS!! 🔥 W/ @Fameye https://t.co/jxXSYFObll

    6.0K4825515276K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.6x their median

    Time will tell 🎸💡🎺 https://t.co/14izDoOQ7Q

    4.9K20538655K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.1x their median

    Feeling Gucci🍭 https://t.co/fq1ihgBiSy

    2.9K5720019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.9x their median

    Gen Z era …. Fameye won’t be happy with the beef happening at all. Still ebefa 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/TsiEM513FI

    2.6K99372134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.9x their median

    “Am I actually Gen Z now or am I just an old head making Gen Z music? 😂”

    2.5K149291223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.8x their median

    Celebrated my birthday this year with the Children of Village of Hope Orphanage home. A life and story I resonate with. Thanks to Pizzaman Chickenman and Creme Russian bakery for coming through. https://t.co/rgdsuhZw05

    2.3K22639620K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.7x their median

    , I didn’t celebrate my birthday by asking for more. I celebrated by giving love to children who, like me, know what it means to grow up without a parent’s embrace. ❤️ I see a part of myself in every one of them. My story started with loss, but God gave me the strength to keep going, and today I’m grateful for how far He has brought me. On my birthday, I chose to remind them that they are loved, seen and never forgotten. 🫂❤️ May every child out there who feels alone find love, hope and a reason to smile. From one orphan to another — we are still here, and our story continues. ❤️ big love to @pizzamanchickenman & @creme_russian_bakery

    2.3K17831536K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Visuals for Gen Z 🤏🤏 👇 👇 ⬇️ https://t.co/mF1tv8ImnN https://t.co/8JDxRhaX9C

    1.9K1149419K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#yfmghana#pizzamangenzpack#pizzamanxfameye#genz#ynews

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.415%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 8.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #yfmghana, #pizzamangenzpack, #pizzamanxfameye.

What is PETER's engagement rate on X?
PETER (@Fameye) has an engagement rate of 0.415%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 346,908 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.415%, PETER sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,672 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fameye have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fameye post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going