Back to @FalleNCS's profile

Gabriel Toledo engagement report

@FalleNCS - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
1.22%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
2.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
424
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 424 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gabriel Toledo's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, Gabriel Toledo sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 18, 202657x their median

    CAMPEÕES. Depois de uma final absurda, decidida em cinco mapas, conseguimos buscar a virada e conquistar a Thunderpick World Championship 2026, foi uma série daquelas que testa tudo, começamos na frente, passamos por momentos difíceis e tivemos que buscar de novo, e buscamos! Esse campeonato também teve um significado especial pra mim individualmente, senti que consegui ajudar muito mais o time em momentos importantes do que nos últimos campeonatos, tive rounds decisivos, clutches e situações de pressão em que consegui ter sucesso e ajudar a buscar essa virada consecutiva de vitória. Claro que uma conquista como essa é de todo mundo e cada jogador teve momentos fundamentais durante nossa caminhada, mas, pessoalmente, foi muito bom sentir que consegui contribuir diretamente em situações que fizeram diferença para chegarmos até esse título. E nessa fase da minha carreira, sabendo que cada campeonato tem um peso diferente e que são últimos que vou jogar, viver um momento como esse significa ainda mais, depois de tanto tempo, voltar a levantar um troféu com esse time é especial demais, e ainda acredito muito que dá para fechar essa história com mais chaves de ouro! Obrigado a todo mundo que acompanhou de casa e, principalmente, à galera que esteve lá presencialmente, torcendo, gritando e empurrando a gente até o último round, esse carinho faz diferença de verdade. Hoje é dia de comemorar!

    22K1.2K34296203K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 202624x their median

    Enquanto não tiver o cara pra resolve , esquece Vlw Brasil

    11K19716931449K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202622x their median

    Meninas da @FURIA e outras indo para o @VALORANT para jogar um jogo com um cenário mais agitado é triste retrato da falha/pouco interesse tanto de nos telespectadores quanto da Valve/torneios em fazer questão de encontrar alternativas para que o eco sistema funcionasse

    9.1K21810116297K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202624x their median

    Respect Messi

    8.8K35815616138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 22, 202621x their median

    Usando o chat 🥹🥹 59 dias… https://t.co/ImBOVOQQxI

    8.5K2466126115K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202617x their median

    Na moral cucurella já correu 90min e não tá nem suando Que cara bom

    6.9K46212167K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 202616x their median

    CAMPEÕES! Meus destaques na final contra BB. FURIA 3 × 2 BB [FINAL] Thunderpick World Championship 2026. https://t.co/Sb0lmVGbHE

    6.5K2369923108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202614x their median

    PARA TODO FIM, SEMPRE TERÁ UM COMEÇO. https://t.co/C0YP7EInDs

    5.7K198259160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202614x their median

    Aqui encerra nossa caminhada na EWC! 🇧🇷 Obrigado a todo o Brasil pela torcida, aos amigos, à família, à Letícia e ao Bartô por estarem sempre comigo e hoje bem de pertinho. Aos meus companheiros de time: só nós sabemos o quanto trabalhamos e acreditamos uns nos outros para chegar até aqui. Próximo encontro é na BLAST Open Porto ja no dia 26 contra paiN! Até lá!

    5.6K541599182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202612x their median

    Gênio https://t.co/s3eAWTdTbp

    5.1K92287133K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 424 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Gabriel Toledo's engagement rate on X?
Gabriel Toledo (@FalleNCS) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,206,962 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, Gabriel Toledo sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FalleNCS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FalleNCS post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going