Back to @Fahdhusain's profile

Fahd Husain engagement report

@Fahdhusain - 434K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 434K followers
Per impression
0.618%
9.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
57
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.17/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.618% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pakistan, #pims, #pimsfire.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #pakistan, #pims, #pimsfire.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fahd Husain's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Fahd Husain sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 252 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202633x their median

    ایک طرف پمز میں لگی آگ ،15 نومولود بچوں کی ہلاکت دیکھیں اور ساتھ ہی اس سرکاری افسر کے ٹھاٹھ ۔۔۔ ریاست کی بربادی اسی سسٹم کے ہاتھوں ہوئی ہے ، سرکاری ملازموں کے ہاتھ میں ریاست کا اختیار ہے اور سیاست دن ان کے شریکِ جرم ، قصہ مختصر اس ملک پر اشرافیہ کا قبضہ ہے اور بس https://t.co/v0o5WPTPtQ

    1.2K5121064564K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202630x their median

    Just heard minister Talal Chaudhry speaking to media at PIMS & defending relief and rescue. He’s an embarrassment. Who sent him to the hospital to utter such inanities?Does no one in govt have any sense of decency? Is this what a minister should be saying while standing at the place where 15 infants burnt to death? The rot runs deeper than we can imagine.

    1.2K3691604071K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202618x their median

    واہ کیا آفس ہے۔ یہ پولیس صاحب کون ہے ؟ https://t.co/rQ5eeJ8Whx

    824825959423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202617x their median

    Pick any govt dept or organisation: it’s rotten. Service delivery is pathetic. The entire system of governance is worse than we can imagine. This is unpardonable. Infants in PIMS burnt to death because official system and bureaucracy is rotten to the core

    5391832003523K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202614x their median

    One of the reasons that PTI is struggling today despite unprecedented support for Imran Khan is epitomised by the reaction within party supporters and much of the party leadership to Hammad Azhar's arrest. Much of the leadership you will find quiet. This has taken us to the point where many are simply looking around their shoulders first for the consequences of any of their actions in a lawless land, because they know no one in the party will have their back. Meanwhile, much of the support base will look at the arrest with suspicion. This is more than sad. I can vouch, having worked with Hammad as part of a small group entrusted to manage the party before the election, to his courage, uprightness and loyalty to Imran Khan. I am sure he will stay as strong and loyal to Imran Khan through his unjust incarceration, and come out, and one day, as is the case in this strange land we love, be a minister once again serving his country. The police that put him in handcuffs will be saluting him again. Thoughts and prayers for his mother, wife and young children through this difficult and unjust time.

    538194401399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.6x their median

    PIMS, CDA, fire department, rescue - all have proven to be the worst ever. Shameful. Absolutely disgusting

    4038649915K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.0x their median

    The enquiry Commitee for PIMS tragedy is composed of people who should be questioned themselves instead of questioning others. This is how make a joke out of a tragedy https://t.co/xq22Zs2YHb

    26510026828K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20266.6x their median

    Fourteen infants burned to death in PIMS is not just a tragedy, it is a crime committed by all those who are entrusted with running the hospital. And their bosses. While we obsess with high politics, this is the harsh reality of Pakistan that is a byproduct of atrocious governance, criminal apathy & and inefficient govt machinery that is rotten to the core. Meaningless statements of “Afsos” by leaders are nothing but salt on the wounds inflicted by these very people and the crumbling system they lord over. https://t.co/E81rkesyKx

    208103561213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.6x their median

    UPDATE on PIMS: In an attempt now to do damage control for the government, parents and families of the victims have been strategically removed from Pims hospital and media is being used to cover the visiting political activities.

    1736715730K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.1x their median

    Look at the latest budget of PIMS! The hospital management has enough money, but not enough sense to run it so infants don’t get burnt to death. We should be angry, not sad. https://t.co/BsYEWgyUcO

    1575613624K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#pakistan#pims#pimsfire#iran#pakistannews

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 57 interactions against 434K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.618% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 33x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #pakistan, #pims, #pimsfire.

What is Fahd Husain's engagement rate on X?
Fahd Husain (@Fahdhusain) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 434,221 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Fahd Husain sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Fahdhusain have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Fahdhusain post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going