Back to @FactFiinder's profile

Fact Finder engagement report

@FactFiinder - 89K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 89K followers
Per impression
0%
420 views on a typical post
Reach
0.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 420 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 208 interactions.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fact Finder's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 17, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ OCCRP rehashes debunked 2023 claims โ€” pure recycled propaganda This is NOT new. Itโ€™s the same old Hindenburg 2.0 narrative about two long-time legitimate global investors (UAEโ€™s Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli & Taiwanโ€™s Chang Chung-Ling), who were business associates of Adani Group with past director roles in affiliated entities. They invested ~$3 billion in listed Adani stocks through fully regulated hedge funds in 2023. ๐Ÿ“Œ Important context on regulatory findings, disclosures, and funding sources Indian law does not require listed companies to track/disclose sources of funds for public shareholders beyond mandatory rules; listed firms have no control over independent trades or visibility into such investments. Adani spokesperson: "Any suggestion that promoter shareholding has been misstated or concealed is incorrect." (From OCCRP article itself) SEBI investigated core Hindenburg allegations (incl. related-party/manipulation claims involving similar entities/transactions). In Sept 2025 final orders on two flagged sets: allegations "not established," no violations found (transactions not related-party under then-applicable rules; no manipulation). Stocks rose post-orders. - SEBI order (Adicorp): https://t.co/8KtQsBOL0u - SEBI order (Milestone/Rehvar): https://t.co/tNpxDtZ3nQ - Reuters (Sep 19, 2025): SEBI dismissed manipulation claims, no breaches; stocks climbed. https://t.co/1xzOEKQO4J Supreme Court (Jan 2024) upheld SEBI's probe, noting confidence in process; rejected transfer requests. Swiss probe into Chang (money laundering/forgery suspicions, assets frozen ~$311M) ongoing since 2021; no charges as of report (Aug 2024 court ruling rejected unfreeze appeal). Adani denies involvement. US cases (2024 indictment/SEC complaint on bribery) ongoing; Adani calls baseless. OCCRP receives significant funding from US government (USAID/State Dept, historically ~50% of budget pre-2025) and Open Society Foundations (George Soros). Critics, including India's ruling BJP, accuse it of pushing anti-India narratives targeting PM Modi and Adani Group (e.g., via reports amplified by opposition). OCCRP states donors have no editorial control. - Mediapart (Dec 2024): https://t.co/HO8iQtZfIt - OCCRP funding: https://t.co/vsiWFLr7Lx - Reuters/The Hindu (Dec 2024): https://t.co/Kfwe9kCoQv Report recycles prior elements (e.g., ties from dismissed 2007/2014 DRI cases). Adani maintains full compliance; investments by public shareholders via regulated funds. Adds regulatory outcomes, legal status, Indian disclosure rules, and funding context for balanced view.

    103100502.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    ๐Ÿ’” https://t.co/CuKZ6BwJDl

    3100865 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    This looks better ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/a2gKIjcKqL

    3000426 viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ India's profile has grown globally. With 40 countries we are having Free Trade agreement (FTA) now: PM Modi from Red fort. https://t.co/Tulm33zK2V

    3000456 viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ Indiaโ€™s exports jump 25.4% in August, narrowing the overall trade deficit. https://t.co/gTQJTqsLYv

    2000328 viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Armenia Could Become The First Foreign Customer For Indiaโ€™s 120 km Guided Pinaka Rocket. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/7zBBPngALu

    1100317 viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    India sends 4th military plane with 11 tons of relief to Nepal. A Tunnel technical contingent, forensics team for DNA analysis also accompanying. In all, 68.5 tons of relief has been sent to Nepal so far by Indian side. https://t.co/rwb0xIeAfm

    1001596 viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Putin meets EAM Jaishankar ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/3FM56PfAIb

    1100330 viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ All vehicles to be fitted with V2V communication system from October 1, 2028 https://t.co/imdgdsxCCD

    0020456 viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ China is in illegal occupation of Indian territories in J&K, says MEA Spox https://t.co/nSFz0gIRlZ

    1100424 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 420 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 208 interactions.

What is Fact Finder's engagement rate on X?
Fact Finder (@FactFiinder) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,362 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FactFiinder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FactFiinder post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going