Fact Finder engagement report
@FactFiinder - 89K followers on X
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 420 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 208 interactions.
Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fact Finder's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 134 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Feb 17, 2026
๐จ OCCRP rehashes debunked 2023 claims โ pure recycled propaganda This is NOT new. Itโs the same old Hindenburg 2.0 narrative about two long-time legitimate global investors (UAEโs Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli & Taiwanโs Chang Chung-Ling), who were business associates of Adani Group with past director roles in affiliated entities. They invested ~$3 billion in listed Adani stocks through fully regulated hedge funds in 2023. ๐ Important context on regulatory findings, disclosures, and funding sources Indian law does not require listed companies to track/disclose sources of funds for public shareholders beyond mandatory rules; listed firms have no control over independent trades or visibility into such investments. Adani spokesperson: "Any suggestion that promoter shareholding has been misstated or concealed is incorrect." (From OCCRP article itself) SEBI investigated core Hindenburg allegations (incl. related-party/manipulation claims involving similar entities/transactions). In Sept 2025 final orders on two flagged sets: allegations "not established," no violations found (transactions not related-party under then-applicable rules; no manipulation). Stocks rose post-orders. - SEBI order (Adicorp): https://t.co/8KtQsBOL0u - SEBI order (Milestone/Rehvar): https://t.co/tNpxDtZ3nQ - Reuters (Sep 19, 2025): SEBI dismissed manipulation claims, no breaches; stocks climbed. https://t.co/1xzOEKQO4J Supreme Court (Jan 2024) upheld SEBI's probe, noting confidence in process; rejected transfer requests. Swiss probe into Chang (money laundering/forgery suspicions, assets frozen ~$311M) ongoing since 2021; no charges as of report (Aug 2024 court ruling rejected unfreeze appeal). Adani denies involvement. US cases (2024 indictment/SEC complaint on bribery) ongoing; Adani calls baseless. OCCRP receives significant funding from US government (USAID/State Dept, historically ~50% of budget pre-2025) and Open Society Foundations (George Soros). Critics, including India's ruling BJP, accuse it of pushing anti-India narratives targeting PM Modi and Adani Group (e.g., via reports amplified by opposition). OCCRP states donors have no editorial control. - Mediapart (Dec 2024): https://t.co/HO8iQtZfIt - OCCRP funding: https://t.co/vsiWFLr7Lx - Reuters/The Hindu (Dec 2024): https://t.co/Kfwe9kCoQv Report recycles prior elements (e.g., ties from dismissed 2007/2014 DRI cases). Adani maintains full compliance; investments by public shareholders via regulated funds. Adds regulatory outcomes, legal status, Indian disclosure rules, and funding context for balanced view.
- Aug 26, 2026
๐ https://t.co/CuKZ6BwJDl
- Sep 12, 2026
This looks better ๐ฅ https://t.co/a2gKIjcKqL
- Aug 15, 2026
๐จ India's profile has grown globally. With 40 countries we are having Free Trade agreement (FTA) now: PM Modi from Red fort. https://t.co/Tulm33zK2V
- Sep 16, 2026
๐จ Indiaโs exports jump 25.4% in August, narrowing the overall trade deficit. https://t.co/gTQJTqsLYv
- Sep 14, 2026
Armenia Could Become The First Foreign Customer For Indiaโs 120 km Guided Pinaka Rocket. ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฅ https://t.co/7zBBPngALu
- Aug 29, 2026
India sends 4th military plane with 11 tons of relief to Nepal. A Tunnel technical contingent, forensics team for DNA analysis also accompanying. In all, 68.5 tons of relief has been sent to Nepal so far by Indian side. https://t.co/rwb0xIeAfm
- Aug 24, 2026
Putin meets EAM Jaishankar ๐ฅ https://t.co/3FM56PfAIb
- Aug 4, 2026
๐จ All vehicles to be fitted with V2V communication system from October 1, 2028 https://t.co/imdgdsxCCD
- Jul 24, 2026
๐จ China is in illegal occupation of Indian territories in J&K, says MEA Spox https://t.co/nSFz0gIRlZ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 89K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 420 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 208 interactions.
- What is Fact Finder's engagement rate on X?
- Fact Finder (@FactFiinder) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 89,362 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, Fact Finder sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FactFiinder have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FactFiinder post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.