Back to @FabrizioRomano's profile

Fabrizio Romano engagement report

@FabrizioRomano - 29M followers on X

Measured over 424 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.116%
of 29M followers
Per impression
1.43%
2.4M views on a typical post
Reach
8.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
276 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
15.57/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 34K interactions against 29M followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 424 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.4M times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 15.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 424 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 823K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avfc, #cfc, #lfc.

Measured over 424 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #avfc, #cfc, #lfc.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fabrizio Romano's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.116%, Fabrizio Romano sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.431%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 202624x their median

    🚨🔵🔴 EXCLUSIVE: RODRI TO BARCELONA, HERE WE GO! 💥 Deal agreed for Spanish midfielder to join Barça from Man City, all done for the former Ballon d’Or. Green light from Man City to last Barcelona bid. More follows. 💣 https://t.co/ECs2v6HIHX

    675K94K19K35K95M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.8x their median

    🚨💣 BREAKING: Carlos Baleba to Manchester United, here we go! Verbal agreement in place between clubs. Improved bid sent today after £65m package rejected and player set to join the only club he wanted. Baleba, new #MUFC player soon. 🇨🇲 https://t.co/1ORh7pLDCk

    247K34K7.4K8.5K30M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.9x their median

    🚨1️⃣6️⃣ Rodri has asked to wear number 16 at Barcelona during his conversations with Fermín López over recent days. Fermín, set to switch to number 7 so Rodri will mantain his iconic 16. 🔵🔴 https://t.co/7tD1nJf1eK

    187K10K1.2K9225.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20265.2x their median

    🌕🇵🇹 João Félix receives Best Player of the Season Award for Saudi Pro League season 2025/26. 🇸🇦 https://t.co/OcJ7FxykYI

    164K10K1.5K8216.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.0x their median

    🚨🔵🔴 Barcelona have reached a verbal agreement for Dominik Livaković to join from Fenerbahçe, here we go! €2m initial fee, €2m add-ons. Plan to sign Livaković as backup GK from June 2027 when Szczesny leaves. This season, Livaković will go out on loan as reported — follows @monfortcarlos.

    154K10.0K1.4K2.7K9.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.8x their median

    🚨 OFFICIAL: FIFA suspensions following post Argentina-Spain clash, including 10 games ban for Paredes, 7 for Nahuel Molina and 1 for Pablo Gavi. 🇦🇷 Paredes: 10-game ban + $90,000 fine 🇦🇷 Molina: 7-game ban + $90,000 fine 🇦🇷 Almada: 1-game ban + $30,000 fine 🇦🇷 Ayala: 3-game ban + $30,000 fine 🇪🇸 Gavi: 1-game ban + $30,000 fine Suspensions are confirmed to be for the national team games. ⚠️

    142K13K2.9K2.8K13M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.6x their median

    🚨🔵🔴 Rodri has arrived: “It’s a dream to be here. We will go for every title”. 🏆✨ @victor_nahe 🎥 https://t.co/LZMl0U5XE8

    144K9.5K1.2K98213M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.5x their median

    🚨⚪️ BREAKING: Tottenham reach verbal agreement with Manchester City to sign Savinho, here we go! Club to club verbal agreement in place tonight with Sávio set to travel for medical at #THFC. Fee will be over £75m, details to follow. Separate talks for Omar Marmoush continue. https://t.co/QlbwCrXdUC

    129K11K4.5K7.7K29M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.2x their median

    🚨🔵🔴 Breaking: Sergio Busquets makes first step in his new career as manager as he signs in as Barcelona B assistant coach. Busquets will work closely with Juliano Belletti while he follows the process to get his coaching license. https://t.co/8pZhZUCJIB

    131K8.3K1.0K1.2K5.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.0x their median

    🚨⚠️ Hansi Flick: “I spoke with Alejandro Balde today and said to him that I think you're not here 109%, so it's best that you stay at home and clear your mind”. “We will talk again tomorrow”. https://t.co/zS4UmswWNW

    131K4.1K6094245.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#avfc#cfc#lfc#thfc#cpfc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34K interactions against 29M followers, an engagement rate of 0.116%. Measured over 424 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.4M times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 15.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 424 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 823K interactions, about 24x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avfc, #cfc, #lfc.

What is Fabrizio Romano's engagement rate on X?
Fabrizio Romano (@FabrizioRomano) has an engagement rate of 0.116%, based on the median interactions across 424 original posts from the last 30 days against 29,073,395 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.116%, Fabrizio Romano sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FabrizioRomano have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FabrizioRomano post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 15.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going