Back to @FaZeNikan's profile

Nikan engagement report

@FaZeNikan - 516K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 516K followers
Per impression
0.096%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
2.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 516K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.096% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 933x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nikan's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Nikan sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 26, 2026933x their median

    Auston Matthews made his choice, seemingly putting the party and the president ahead of the playoffs https://t.co/YbVZkvAcdd

    4.3K3635.4K1.1K5.9M viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 2026303x their median

    Seedance 2.0 got its perfect match on Higgsfield. Grok Imagine and Seedance 2.0 - xAI's image model paired with the category-leading video model, natively inside the platform. Grok Imagine generates your reference image in 9+ styles, fast. Seedance 2.0 - ranked #1 in image-to-video - takes it further than any other model can. The best results out of Seedance 2.0 start here.

    2.1K39145765210M viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 2026295x their median

    If you're mad Auston Matthews visited the white house after winning gold for his country and are "looking at him differently" now. You probably shouldn't ever watch any kind of sports ever again. like??? HE JUST WON GOLD!?

    3.3K1061326422K viewsView on X
  • Apr 4, 2026234x their median

    In 1888, moving images were born. Decades to reach everyone, a camera in every pocket. Now your imagination is the only limit. Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield, built to excel at cinematic, commercial, cartoon, and 3D CGI. 🎁 Hidden in our timeline. Available everywhere except the US and Japan.

    1.5K49658617915M viewsView on X
  • Dec 20, 2025108x their median

    Can’t say shit about jake Paul now. What a fucking beast.

    9202033124163K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202638x their median

    I’ve never in my life felt so small, very humbling experience thank you fellas 🀝 (I stand at 6”8 btw absolutely unbelievable in being towered over like this) https://t.co/e8gF9vEy3o

    42011211105K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 202625x their median

    I just don’t see Sean beating Khamzat tonight But hey recently I’ve been mostly wrong πŸ˜‚ SURLEY WE SMACK HERE!? πŸ”’ Reply with your shuffle usernames I’ll be tipping some of you when this hits! πŸ“· πŸ™ https://t.co/1fxWYTBSIc

    15013317049K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202621x their median

    LOOKING FOR A FULL TIME THUMBNAIL DESIGNER! Tag people you think can produce thumbnails like the few below. πŸ™ FOR MULTIPLE IRL GAMBLING CHANNELS $300 IF YOU REFER SOMEONE WE HIRE! https://t.co/ezniwT54Er

    6712258011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202613x their median

    Forgot I filmed this but this angle was insane. πŸ˜… @RyanGarcia https://t.co/5mTcZOgAQ2

    15515022K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202613x their median

    Anyone know who photobombed uncle Dana and I? https://t.co/OZjiEuNl9K

    142111018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 516K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.096% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 933x its own typical post.

What is Nikan's engagement rate on X?
Nikan (@FaZeNikan) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 515,691 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Nikan sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FaZeNikan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FaZeNikan post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going