Back to @FTChinese's profile

FTChinese engagement report

@FTChinese - 706K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 706K followers
Per impression
0.022%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 706K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.022% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60 interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chatftc, #ft中文网, #每日小测.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #chatftc, #ft中文网, #每日小测.

Compared with accounts its own size

FTChinese's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, FTChinese sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202660x their median

    【油价涨至每桶105美元 重燃债券抛售】油价的最新涨势为债券抛售潮增添了新的动力,因为投资者押注能源涨价将引发全球通胀飙升。欧洲央行已在周四决定加息以遏制通胀。 https://t.co/h0IH0yJQCK https://t.co/rC5cU3BE9E

    115804.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202644x their median

    【OpenAI新任董事会高官:失去对AI系统控制的风险已“十分严峻”】保罗•克里斯蒂亚诺称,如果不加强安全功能,先进版本的人工智能可能会杀死“大多数人”https://t.co/SjRYujTBHJ https://t.co/5soaNE4b2D

    304104.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202643x their median

    【甲骨文加速AI战略,数据中心营收激增】数据中心销售额加快增长,表明该公司在高风险的AI基础设施竞赛中取得进展。 https://t.co/KyVhokUYdw https://t.co/NthxqQEmYw

    104203.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202641x their median

    【新加坡推出每孩5.5万美元补助以提振生育率】这个城市国家今年将步入“超老龄社会”。 https://t.co/emQhZkyt3E https://t.co/6hnUYXOLFD

    13321426K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202638x their median

    【从东大跳槽香港科技大的科学家如是说】物理学家 渡边悠树:香港汇聚了一批曾经活跃在美国的顶尖人才,能够感受到在世界崛起的势头。日本解决问题的行动迟缓,看不到科研环境改善的迹象……https://t.co/hTm2PqDOlg https://t.co/BNgSEvqFP8

    13123117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202637x their median

    【乌克兰称泽连斯基所乘飞机险遭无人机击中】 乌克兰总统的随行官员称,发起袭击的一架俄罗斯喷气动力攻击无人机。https://t.co/4JtF4DwJY7 https://t.co/WzeqJMyYC1

    16120020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202637x their median

    用 #ChatFTC 智能搜索,更快找到相关FT内容——结合关键词与语义搜索,帮助您快速查找 #FT中文网 相关报道、观点与分析,找到真正需要的信息!高端会员专享,现在订阅享全年最低5折优惠。https://t.co/0ydh7V1pPd https://t.co/yEprVYz7pX

    003708.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202637x their median

    今天你看 #FT中文网 了么?点击下方链接,来挑战一下 #每日小测 。高端订阅会员专属AI助手 #ChatFTC 帮你快速梳理最新全球财经大事件,发现更多有价值的信息。https://t.co/AEoaSt75zV https://t.co/rXKF6PtKVi

    2035012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202636x their median

    【特朗普向高级助理娜塔莉•哈普发放4.5万美元节日奖金】近几周来,美国总统的这位行政助理突然进入了公众视野。https://t.co/UCr9OKpU4j https://t.co/4BqOWov5k8

    2034017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202636x their median

    【强迫世界选边站队 美国为何要降下AI“数字铁幕”?】杜毓斌:美方的逻辑在于,各国应放弃建立端到端独立技术体系的设想,转而将自身嵌入到以美国为核心的分工网络中。 https://t.co/dkNkQMq1BZ https://t.co/uSSDtZPW18

    3033012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chatftc#ft中文网#每日小测

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 706K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.022% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60 interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chatftc, #ft中文网, #每日小测.

What is FTChinese's engagement rate on X?
FTChinese (@FTChinese) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 706,254 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, FTChinese sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FTChinese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FTChinese post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going