Blue Moon engagement report
@FRBlueMoon - 133K followers on X
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 606 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.455%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.
Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #mancity.
Compared with accounts its own size
Blue Moon's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.455%, Blue Moon sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 400 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 20266.2x their median
🇵🇸 https://t.co/ASWTxMV29z
- Sep 25, 20265.7x their median
🚨🆕 Andy Robertson sur #ManCity : "Pour moi, les joueurs de Manchester City ont montré sur le terrain qu’ils étaient suffisamment bons. Je ne connais pas vraiment les détails concernant les accusations et tout ce qui va avec. Mais ils avaient une équipe incroyable, une équipe que j’ai adoré affronter. Je ne pense pas que, dans ce genre de situation, les joueurs puissent être tenus pour responsables. C’est tout ce sur quoi je peux me concentrer."
- Sep 26, 20265.3x their median
Pablo Zabaleta et Micah Richards. 🩵 https://t.co/y8scg6ydsi
- Sep 25, 20264.5x their median
🚨 Kevin De Bruyne a délivré la 300e passe décisive de sa carrière. 👑 https://t.co/ldpMKMIB23
- Sep 27, 20263.0x their median
🩵🥰 Erling & Bernardo. https://t.co/YukPfW3lE3
- Sep 25, 20262.5x their median
🚨🆕 Rodri sur #ManCity et les 114 infractions : "Nous avons vécu une situation très similaire en 2020. La procédure juridique était comparable, même si la partie qui avait engagé les poursuites était différente. Au sein du club, on nous a toujours transmis un sentiment de calme et de confiance quant à l’issue de cette affaire. Finalement, le club avait été acquitté. J’espère simplement que justice sera rendue, quel que soit le verdict. Mais, connaissant très bien ce club, je suis convaincu qu’il s’en sortira sans aucune sanction." [via @Blaugranation_]
- Sep 26, 20262.4x their median
🚨🆕 Notre ancien gardien, formé au club, Gavin Bazunu, 𝗥𝗘𝗙𝗨𝗦𝗘 de jouer pour l’Irlande contre Israël. 🇮🇪❌ L’entraînement a été suspendu alors que plusieurs de ses coéquipiers envisagent également de rejoindre le boycott. 👏🏼 [via @McDonnellDan] https://t.co/sY3ik1ArzX
- Sep 26, 20262.3x their median
🚨💣 BREAKING : Communiqué de Khaldoon Al Mubarak : "Je fais partie de ce club depuis 18 ans. J'ai eu le privilège d'être à vos côtés à l'Etihad, à Wembley et à Istanbul. Ce club compte pour moi, et vous m'avez montré et dit – maintes et maintes fois – à quel point Manchester City compte pour vous. C'est pourquoi je vous écris aujourd'hui. Suite aux informations parues dans les médias vendredi, beaucoup d'entre vous ont sans doute passé la soirée à répondre aux questions et aux messages de vos amis, de votre famille et de vos collègues. Moi aussi. Voici ce que j'ai dit à ma famille : la procédure engagée par la Premier League est encore loin d'être terminée, et notre confiance ainsi que notre détermination à démontrer l'innocence du club restent aussi fortes qu'au premier jour. Il y a tant de choses que j'aimerais pouvoir partager avec vous pour vous faire comprendre pourquoi nous sommes si confiants quant à notre position. Toutefois, la stricte confidentialité de la procédure juridique et notre volonté de la respecter m'empêchent de le faire pour l'instant. Même cette lettre a fait l'objet de plusieurs vérifications juridiques pour en garantir la conformité. Je vous invite à lire attentivement la déclaration ci-dessous, que nous avons publiée vendredi, ainsi que celle que nous avions diffusée en février 2023 (également ci-dessous). Chaque mot compte et reste valable. Alors que certains se sont empressés de tirer leurs propres conclusions et que beaucoup de bruit circule autour de nous, rien n'a changé. Nous avons déjà surmonté des défis ensemble et nous en sommes sortis vainqueurs. Nombreux sont ceux qui cherchent à freiner la dynamique de notre club. Nous ne leur en donnerons pas l'occasion. De grands moments nous attendent après cette trêve internationale. Nous nous déplacerons à Anfield dans quinze jours, puis nous accueillerons le Paris Saint-Germain en Ligue des champions à l'Etihad Stadium ; autant d'occasions de célébrer la force de la famille Manchester City. Merci, comme toujours, pour votre soutien indéfectible. Khaldoon Al Mubarak Président Manchester City Football Club"
- Sep 25, 20262.2x their median
🚨💣 Il est peu probable que #ManCity soit déchu de ses titres remportés entre 2009 et 2018, période durant laquelle la majorité des infractions présumées auraient eu lieu. Le club pourrait en revanche être sanctionné par un retrait de points, une relégation, une lourde amende ou encore une interdiction de recrutement. [via @TimesSport]
- Sep 25, 20261.8x their median
🚨💣 BREAKING : Andy Burnham, le premier ministre britannique prend la parole : "Je viens d'apprendre ces rapports, et je pense qu'il ne s'agit que de rapports à ce stade. S'ils s'avèrent exacts, je voudrai certainement examiner le rapport de la commission indépendante. Les gens ne devraient pas se précipiter pour conclure qu'il faut dépouiller Manchester City de ses titres avant d'avoir lu le rapport. C'était un processus long et très conflictuel entre le club et la Premier League anglaise, donc je ne pense pas que ce soit aussi simple. Tout le monde devrait étudier le rapport de la commission indépendante en détail avant de tirer des conclusions." [via @MciWorld_] https://t.co/TquEvkbcb5
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 606 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0.455%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.
- What is Blue Moon's engagement rate on X?
- Blue Moon (@FRBlueMoon) has an engagement rate of 0.455%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 133,136 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.455%, Blue Moon sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,805 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @FRBlueMoon have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @FRBlueMoon post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.