Back to @FFToday's profile

Fantasy Football Today engagement report

@FFToday - 326K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 326K followers
Per impression
0.2%
9.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
19
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 326K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 277 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fantasy Football Today's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Fantasy Football Today sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 131 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 202615x their median

    Who should you pick up after the De’Von Achane injury? @AdamAizer and @DanSchneierNFL share the fantasy profiles of Jaylen Wright and Ollie Gordon II Watch all the latest injury updates here: https://t.co/rF0de5m2Ss https://t.co/sD1WmcWal3

    259810062K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202612x their median

    "Omarion Hampton has the potential to be the biggest bust in fantasy" Should you trade him? Watch here to find out: https://t.co/kAHfvpplov https://t.co/0pzU8rQly3

    208621143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    Ashton Jeanty left Raiders practice with an apparent injury @daverichard shares what he saw while attending https://t.co/0BfXBuNSfg

    194135148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.7x their median

    🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Adam is NOT happy the match was called early after weather Dan wins 6-2, 2-1 https://t.co/mVIRvK8ZNx

    162518018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.3x their median

    Imagine accidentally drafting Trevor Etienne INSTEAD of Travis 😂 @daverichard got to the bottom of it https://t.co/gVFuhEYr56

    158712034K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.4x their median

    .@JameyEisenberg takes the court! 🎾 https://t.co/sBDRybFaJz

    9832011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.1x their median

    No context Adam v Dan tennis match... https://t.co/zuYnMsGQ5y

    9034013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.4x their median

    "Im LOSING it Heath, I am LOSING it" @AdamAizer and @heathcummingssr break down Travis Etienne limited usage on Sunday. Watch the full list of winners & losers from Week 2 here: https://t.co/PBbE3HItNM https://t.co/9zDd1n6FGF

    7761012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.2x their median

    "Both McMillan and Coker are must-starts" For Jamey & Heath's top starts & sits, watch here: https://t.co/oo8OlqgZGF https://t.co/3IPpnQRdzF

    6974015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.2x their median

    FINAL Week 1 Start/Sit Cheat Sheet! LIVE Q&A + Actives/Inactives News | 2026 Fantasy Football https://t.co/dBbAELuhnR

    724409.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 326K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.5K times each, and 0.2% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 277 interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Fantasy Football Today's engagement rate on X?
Fantasy Football Today (@FFToday) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 326,155 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Fantasy Football Today sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FFToday have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FFToday post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going