Back to @FCBayernUS's profile

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ engagement report

@FCBayernUS - 828K followers on X

Measured over 155 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 828K followers
Per impression
2.14%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
115
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.83/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 828K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 155 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.647% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 155 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fcbvfb, #s04fcb, #fc27.

Measured over 155 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #fcbvfb, #s04fcb, #fc27.

Compared with accounts its own size

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦'s engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,465 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202646x their median

    Equalizing season record vs Bayern today https://t.co/n8p3bbA9Sb

    5.2K70238320K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202625x their median

    THIS CROSSOVER πŸ₯°πŸ’œπŸ‡°πŸ‡· https://t.co/N5HjjFgGtK

    2.1K79912520K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202617x their median

    When you realize there’s no Kompany ball for three weeks 😭 https://t.co/OXAzTXAEjt

    1.9K1063327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202611x their median

    The person above is a huge FC Bayern fan ⬆️ https://t.co/1JoZNG9qMi

    1.2K456216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20267.7x their median

    When your friends ask what your weekend plans are πŸ‘€ https://t.co/Gpjgbs09gr

    802761113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.1x their median

    π‘ͺπ’Šπ’π’†π’Žπ’‚π’•π’Šπ’„ 𝑲𝒂𝒏𝒆 🎬 https://t.co/AvVGpUteH7

    76352429.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.1x their median

    Rainy with a chance of Phonz β˜”οΈ https://t.co/MUePCZhKUB

    777383110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20266.4x their median

    This is Olise reporting for duty, over. πŸ•΅ https://t.co/Ebc1XFYprw

    70630108.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.3x their median

    Every time I see Harry Kane on my tv πŸ₯° https://t.co/iGlEV33UBe

    684362110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.6x their median

    Supercup Champs πŸ† https://t.co/G01jJxrpTY

    58356527.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fcbvfb#s04fcb#fc27#bundesligapotm

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 115 interactions against 828K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 155 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.647% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 155 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.3K interactions, about 46x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fcbvfb, #s04fcb, #fc27.

What is πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦'s engagement rate on X?
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ (@FCBayernUS) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 155 original posts from the last 30 days against 828,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ FC Bayern US πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @FCBayernUS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @FCBayernUS post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going