Back to @ExposedVocals's profile

Exposed Vocals engagement report

@ExposedVocals - 117K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 117K followers
Per impression
0%
521 views on a typical post
Reach
0.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 521 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.445% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Exposed Vocals's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Exposed Vocals sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026

    From the Underground to the Sphere: How @Metallica Became Immortal https://t.co/k7givtX5y5

    2210626 viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    UMG Sues DistroKid as the Music Industry’s AI Fight Moves Into Distribution https://t.co/fB2TcKdABB

    3000608 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    “I’m Not Writing or Recording With Any Audience in Mind”: Ryan Colt Levy Reclaims His Musical Voice as RCL https://t.co/jun4eh8OBK

    1110726 viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Sarah Louise Finds Strength in Vulnerability on ‘Different Kind of Girl’ https://t.co/uW8mEDcjyG

    2000544 viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    From Medellín to MetLife: How Karol G Became a Global Bichota https://t.co/uzqZX1RqJJ

    1100942 viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Metallica Was Right. Napster Changed Everything. https://t.co/JSpmcbfNPn

    1100655 viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Everclear’s “Father of Mine”: I Was the Boy. I Refuse to Be That Father. https://t.co/Thf54lMw1w

    1100645 viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Love Ghost x Sofia Thompson- “Fragrance” (official music video) https://t.co/eI2VQnjlA7

    1000695 viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    The Album Isn’t Dead—Your Rollout Is https://t.co/OYHHoIJ2P0

    1000521 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    “Everyone Carries Their Own Version of That Journey”: The October Effect on ‘Self Portrait,’ Identity and Musical Fate https://t.co/y9oUFpZeza

    1000575 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 117K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 521 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.445% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

What is Exposed Vocals's engagement rate on X?
Exposed Vocals (@ExposedVocals) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 117,062 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Exposed Vocals sits below the 10th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ExposedVocals have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ExposedVocals post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going