Back to @EvilGeniuses's profile

Evil Geniuses engagement report

@EvilGeniuses - 558K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 558K followers
Per impression
0.199%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dfesports, #dfrise, #evofrance2026.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #dfesports, #dfrise, #evofrance2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Evil Geniuses's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Evil Geniuses sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 96 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026127x their median

    #VCTAmericas https://t.co/MvkU6oJ0gc

    2.2K7610228K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026123x their median

    This marks the end of our season. We thank you all for the support this year! ๐Ÿ’™ https://t.co/dfKxYrWHhK

    2.1K53581835K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202699x their median

    We're back for more action! #VCTGameChangers ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/7kPRs7DRbh https://t.co/L2GEG55qtr

    1.8K162128K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202695x their median

    VAMOOOOOOO #VALORANTChampions https://t.co/rfERdR5GOq

    1.6K10113525K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202676x their median

    PLAYOFFS BOUND. WE'RE NOT DONE YET. #VCTAmericas https://t.co/uuQ10RVIw2

    1.3K60231120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202675x their median

    We must not fear. #VCTAmericas https://t.co/eoPs30Vx4c

    1.3K6510930K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202650x their median

    This series concludes our #VCTGameChangers season. Thank you for all your support this year, weโ€™re so proud of this team! ๐Ÿ’™ https://t.co/cVmnNGDwlU

    8622010840K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202646x their median

    game in 1 hour #VCTGameChangers https://t.co/vXMd78Ktzf

    81781018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202641x their median

    It's a Meesh takeover. 2026 edition! Shop now: https://t.co/cR8FuIcSgP https://t.co/aYQiLakfwj

    566792869319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202636x their median

    Potter rn #VCTAmericas https://t.co/BCA6Tw1cA2

    620216120K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dfesports#dfrise#evofrance2026#valorantchampions#rog20thanniversary

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 32% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.3K interactions, about 127x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dfesports, #dfrise, #evofrance2026.

What is Evil Geniuses's engagement rate on X?
Evil Geniuses (@EvilGeniuses) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 558,367 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Evil Geniuses sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EvilGeniuses have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EvilGeniuses post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going