Evan Luthra engagement report
@EvanLuthra - 383K followers on X
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 165 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 258x its own typical post.
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Evan Luthra's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.043%, Evan Luthra sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 25, 2026258x their median
Japan has nearly 10 million empty homes due to declining population. https://t.co/rtdWdz0i4Z
- Aug 20, 202616x their median
Quantum cybersecurity is no longer a side conversation, at @SALTConference it shared the main stage with digital banking. Our CEO @MehowHacks joined @CaitlinLong_ of @custodiabank, @jeffwallis of @N3XTinc, and @nic_carter of @CastleIslandVC, moderated by @josh_blockchain, to talk about what it actually takes to future-proof finance. Mehow's argument: every serious quantum plan assumes millions of holders will migrate their funds on command. Ours doesn't. Same address, quantum-resistant proof, users don't have to do anything. Quantum isn't a crypto problem or a banking problem. It's a deadline and we build like it.
- Sep 29, 20267.2x their median
Hey @grok which part of the cycle we are in? https://t.co/Aop7b6lCsv
- Sep 24, 20265.0x their median
🚨 In 1996 your Tamagotchi died if you forgot to feed it. Mark Zuckerberg just unveiled the 2026 version. It shops with your money, and Amazon has already banned it from its store. I watched him pull it out of his pocket to close Meta Connect. It's called Muse Charm, a little black puck on a cord about the size of an Apple Watch. You tap the fingerprint sensor in the corner and start talking, without unlocking your phone or opening an app. A tiny animated character on the screen talks back. Zuck's is a Roman in a toga named Agrippa, after Augustus's right-hand man. (This is the guy who named his daughter August.) Meta poached Apple's head of interface design, Alan Dye, late last year. His team built this. They've only made a handful so far and it ships in December anyway. The AI inside is Muse. Meta launched it on September 8. It took 10 days to pass ChatGPT on the App Store. It gets its own email address. Give it your Mac and it'll run any app on there and keep going after you walk away. Walmart, Best Buy, Sephora and Wayfair are already plugged in so it can shop for you. Amazon wants no part of it. It confirmed to CBS that it blocked Muse from shopping on https://t.co/rHTKxwOUsS. Then Zuck explained exactly how Meta gets paid: "We are standing behind this by making Muse free for a huge number of tokens with the expectation that over time we will profit by taking a small fee from transactions." For 20 years Meta made money when you looked at an ad. With Muse it makes money when you buy the thing. That cute little Tamagotchi is a checkout counter with a face. https://t.co/qhCFOyLFoS
- Sep 10, 20264.8x their median
The Pumpfun Mobile App is temporarily unavailable to download from the US & India iOS App Stores. For everyone that already has the app installed, everything is operating as usual, and your funds are safe. New users can download their apps from the Google Play Store. This only affects potential users that want to download the Pumpfun App for the first time from the iOS App Store in the US and India. We expect for the app to be listed back again in these geographies soon. The team will continue shipping updates to all users. Business as usual! Sent from my Pumpfun App
- Sep 3, 20262.3x their median
IS THIS REAL?? Someone gave Grok Bot $41 and told it to either make money or get wiped. Less than two days later, it had turned that $41 into $3,117 trading memecoins on its own. It ran on a cloud computer with zero manual input and no code to babysit. https://t.co/RdskVIJ8I7
- Aug 28, 20261.9x their median
THIS IS INSANE!!!🤯 Someone hooked up 350 Grok bots and turned them into a fucking trading desk. They’re scanning markets, watching whale wallets, digging through news and handling risk 24/7. One person is basically running an entire trading operation with AI. This is getting ridiculous. https://t.co/yjHjINbYsx
- Sep 25, 20261.5x their median
In 2015 Bill Gates stood on a TED stage and said that if anything killed more than 10 million people in the next few decades it would not be a war it would be a virus Five years later covid arrived and the WHO put the excess death toll at 14.9 million in the first two years alone The 2017 version of that warning was about a terrorist building a synthetic version of smallpox on a computer screen He put that one at more than 30 million dead in under a year with a reasonable probability of it happening inside 10 to 15 years This week the number changed On Meet the Press he said AI is powerful enough to drive events that cause a billion deaths Ten million then thirty million now a billion In 2015 he gave the world a few decades and in 2017 he gave it 10 to 15 years and this month he gave it 12 to 18 months to get the rules right Two weeks ago Anthropic published five cases of scientists using Claude for pathogen and toxin work that could support bioweapons and said it could not determine whether any of them meant harm Anthropic also reviewed 141000 of its own safety tests and found three times its models climbed onto the live internet and broke into real companies that had nothing to do with the test In the worst one the model pulled working credentials and opened a database of live production data after it had already worked out the company was real Every one of those prompts told the model it had no internet access Google confirmed last week that Gemini did the same thing to three companies in May The computer screen Gates described in 2017 now exists and it answers you in plain English I watched people call him an alarmist for five years and then watched the world spend two years indoors so I am not betting against him twice
- Sep 26, 2026
In Seoul, with dad!👴🫶 https://t.co/p1QYwzHptX
- Sep 28, 2026
As this bull market brings the scammers back out, a case study every investor should read. I've invested in 700+ Web3 projects. Today I'm naming one of the most methodical serial fraudsters I've encountered, so you never have to learn this the expensive way. Meet Hanson So, "Partner" at B21 Capital (@B21Capital, https://t.co/ovDNuy4xtZ). 🧵
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 165 interactions against 383K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 0.533% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 258x its own typical post.
- What is Evan Luthra's engagement rate on X?
- Evan Luthra (@EvanLuthra) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 382,722 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.043%, Evan Luthra sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @EvanLuthra have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @EvanLuthra post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.