Back to @Ethanoshi's profile

Ethan Satoshi engagement report

@Ethanoshi - 145K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 145K followers
Per impression
0.625%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.625% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 469 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ethan Satoshi's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Ethan Satoshi sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,727 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.149%
p750.706%
p902.63%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 218,727 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,722 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.149%
75th percentile0.706%
90th percentile2.63%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video31% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 293 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202613x their median

    33 more runners have been selected. check here ➡ https://t.co/5PVMnDq0oz sharing is caring 👇 so tell us a friend who deserves a spot https://t.co/8tEAJtssMM

    276341312819K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.3x their median

    Something interesting on @pharos_network caught my attention. @ProsperTicker looks like a meme launchpad, but there’s a deeper experiment underneath: Performance vs belief. The Vault shows how a Curator’s strategy is actually performing onchain. p{VAULT} is a separate market showing what traders believe about that strategy. So you can watch two things at once: Actual performance → Vault Market conviction → p{VAULT} And they don’t have to move together. That’s the part I find interesting.

    5706006.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.6x their median

    If your future self could text you right now. He'd probably say “buy $LARP ” Because apparently we're both tired of being responsible. Love you @larp_coinsol https://t.co/oBkw9IdmQX

    4614504.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.3x their median

    I’ve seen enough memes die because nobody wanted to work for the bag. $MOTION got a different problem these mfs actually enjoy bagworking. memes, content, community showing up daily. I’ll take that over fancy promises any day. @getmotion_sol https://t.co/nIZyWi7z0p

    4413712.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.1x their median

    Was scrolling through degen X and somehow landed on @larp_coinsol 😂 At first I checked the chart. Then I realized the real play might be the culture behind it. solana:EygStH4gHv1h4E8w4raYv6NGsrDiij3nbfCc26iTpump is basically crypto in one word: everyone is pretending they know what happens next. I grabbed a small bag. Nothing crazy. Sometimes the memes that people actually relate to travel further than the ones trying too hard. Personal opinion: solana:EygStH4gHv1h4E8w4raYv6NGsrDiij3nbfCc26iTpump is one of the more interesting memecoin metas on my radar right now. solana:EygStH4gHv1h4E8w4raYv6NGsrDiij3nbfCc26iTpump

    4203302.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    New strategy for crypto events, take one photo near a VIP table, crop everyone else out, caption it BIG THINGS COMING. Networking: 4/10 @larp_coinsol : 10/10 https://t.co/V6NXJvXdR8

    4103303.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.8x their median

    I finally found a use for my old losing trades. Deleted the numbers, kept the screenshots, now they’re $LARP material. Turn bad trades into good content. @larp_coinsol might be the first bag where my mistakes have utility. https://t.co/Y8NHbLLy3D

    3812702.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.8x their median

    Crypto regulation finally feels less like “someday.” More clarity is coming while money continues flowing into Bitcoin ETFs. Rules + institutional money could change the game faster than people expect.

    3912505.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.6x their median

    The more I looked into @DualMintRWA, the more I realized PLAY isn't really a story about claw machines. It's a test of whether ordinary machines can become an onchain financial asset. Think about where most crypto yield comes from: lending, trading activity, incentives or token emissions. PLAY starts somewhere completely different. There are 200 operating claw machines. Real people play them. Those machines generate real-world revenue. DualMint packages that machine economics into PLAY and brings it onchain through Solana. Steel earns it. Solana moves it. The current PLAY raise has a $230K deposit target, with a 12–15% target annual yield and monthly distributions. That 12–15% is a target, not a guarantee and that's actually what makes this worth watching. The real experiment is whether revenue from physical machines can consistently support an onchain financial product without needing a speculative token loop to create the underlying cash flow. Pre-deposits opened Sep 22, and I'm following the progress through Uptime while keeping an eye on @DualMintRWA and @stardotfun. If PLAY works as designed, claw machines may be the least interesting part.

    27031014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.6x their median

    Nobody’s ugly some of us are just waiting for the bank account glow-up. 💸 https://t.co/yuTNP9GWJ0

    3801804.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 21,624 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.625% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 469 interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is Ethan Satoshi's engagement rate on X?
Ethan Satoshi (@Ethanoshi) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 144,977 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Ethan Satoshi sits above the 10th percentile of the 218,727 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Ethanoshi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,624 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Ethanoshi post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going