Back to @EsTendenciaEnX's profile

Es tendencia en 𝕏 engagement report

@EsTendenciaEnX - 653K followers on X

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.133%
of 653K followers
Per impression
1.64%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
8.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
853
interactions (median)
Saved
0.139%
72 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.33/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 853 interactions against 653K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 157K interactions, about 241x its own typical post.

Measured over 88 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Es tendencia en 𝕏's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.133%, Es tendencia en 𝕏 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 23, 2025241x their median

    “Asesinos”: Porque estos dos chocaron a 120km por hora a una mamá y su hija en Rosario y les desprendieron las cabezas de los cuerpos por el impacto Agustin podría recibir hasta 25 años de prisión https://t.co/K9u6Xjmcmo

    144K10K2.0K98113M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026113x their median

    “Messi”: Porque apareció una foto inédita de La Pulga en Qatar 2022, feliz y campeón https://t.co/MSURNROEtv

    91K5.4K61131629K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202656x their median

    ''Efecto Mandela'': Porque nadie recordaba que Messi le cerró la puerta a la prensa por decirle falopero a Lavezzi https://t.co/qyzT3wgWet

    45K1.9K2201321.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202647x their median

    “Torres Gemelas”: Porque recrearon exactamente con IA el 9/11/01 https://t.co/JPV2tUN1lg

    35K4.3K3631619.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202626x their median

    “Embotellamiento lácteo”: Porque llevó a la mejor amiga al telo y las pelotas le dolieron una semana https://t.co/NccrFnGa5x

    21K409171272.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202622x their median

    ''Hija de puta'': Porque la ex novia entró a la cancha y le rompió la entrada al ex dejandolo afuera del estadio en la despedida de Messi https://t.co/Erb3UuPBVv

    18K4717238621K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202621x their median

    “Bullying”: Porque el bully terminó comiendo piso en el suelo en un colegio yankee https://t.co/aANuiUhEKZ

    17K4259215800K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202616x their median

    “Emilio”: Porque encontraron a Emilio puteando a Messi cuando Argentina casi no entra al mundial https://t.co/TMj0t0khgf

    13K510578216654K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202614x their median

    “Maru Botana”: Porque continúa esquivando la harina, tenía que puntuar 10 sanguches y no les dio un solo bocado, solo arrastraba el relleno con los utensilios, para no ingerir una miga de pan en MásterChef https://t.co/ls48LqzWnf

    11K34927389522K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202611x their median

    “Colectivero”: Porque llevó a una señora con movilidad reducida a su casa estacionando el colectivo con los pasajeros arriba https://t.co/UUNtTKCFoy

    8.9K2274117213K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 853 interactions against 653K followers, an engagement rate of 0.133%. Measured over 88 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 1.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 88 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 157K interactions, about 241x its own typical post.

What is Es tendencia en 𝕏's engagement rate on X?
Es tendencia en 𝕏 (@EsTendenciaEnX) has an engagement rate of 0.133%, based on the median interactions across 88 original posts from the last 30 days against 653,308 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.133%, Es tendencia en 𝕏 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @EsTendenciaEnX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @EsTendenciaEnX post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going